Talk:Exotemperament: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
 
Keenan Pepper (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


When exactly do we speak of a low-complexity comma? Answering that question could open up options for '''new''' [[:category:comma|categories for commas]] (we currently sub-categorize them by size). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
When exactly do we speak of a low-complexity comma? Answering that question could open up options for '''new''' [[:category:comma|categories for commas]] (we currently sub-categorize them by size). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
:It's the [[complexity]] of the comma as an interval. So there are multiple ways to define it precisely, but they're all highly correlated. Examples: [[Benedetti height]]/[[Tenney height]], [[Tenney-Euclidean metrics#TE norm|TE norm]], [[Generalized Tenney Norms and Tp Interval Space]], [[Kees height]]... —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 20:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 29 June 2021

Low complexity criterion

When exactly do we speak of a low-complexity comma? Answering that question could open up options for new categories for commas (we currently sub-categorize them by size). --Xenwolf (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

It's the complexity of the comma as an interval. So there are multiple ways to define it precisely, but they're all highly correlated. Examples: Benedetti height/Tenney height, TE norm, Generalized Tenney Norms and Tp Interval Space, Kees height... —Keenan Pepper (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)