User talk:Rperlner: Difference between revisions
→Scherzo in 26 EDO: new section |
m →Scherzo in 26 EDO: some minor changes |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hi Ray, <br> | Hi Ray, <br> | ||
your Scherzo in | your '''Scherzo in 26 EDO''' sounds great. The notation looks quite uncommon to readers of classic music but interesting. After a bit of calculation I found out that the accidentals actually cause a 1\[[26edo|26]] shift. Notating the piece in "B" causes that no double-flats have to be used (also F# and C# would allow this). I think we should have at least one article about circle-of-fifths notation(s) in the XenWiki. Thanks for sharing. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC) <br> | ||
<small>PS: the sixfold ''forte'' in the 3rd-last bar before ''Fine'' seems like a glitch to me. </small> | <small>PS: the sixfold ''forte'' in the 3rd-last bar before ''Fine'' seems like a glitch to me. </small> | ||
Revision as of 13:27, 14 November 2020
Octatonic Groove
Hi Rperlner, welcome to the Wiki 🙂 Thanks for sharing your pieces! (the 48-EDO version makes more sense to me) Best regards --Xenwolf (talk) 10:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Yeah, Everyone I've talked to seems to like the 48-EDO version better. I also have a 26 edo version I like quite a lot, which I'll get around to uploading eventually. Pleased to meet you. -- Rperlner
Scherzo in 26 EDO
Hi Ray,
your Scherzo in 26 EDO sounds great. The notation looks quite uncommon to readers of classic music but interesting. After a bit of calculation I found out that the accidentals actually cause a 1\26 shift. Notating the piece in "B" causes that no double-flats have to be used (also F# and C# would allow this). I think we should have at least one article about circle-of-fifths notation(s) in the XenWiki. Thanks for sharing. --Xenwolf (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
PS: the sixfold forte in the 3rd-last bar before Fine seems like a glitch to me.