Talk:5/4: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:55, 9 October 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →"classic" misleading: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:58, 9 October 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →"classic" misleading: alternative suggestions Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	To me it seems we'd better name it "just major third". The word "classic" is so closely related to [[wikipedia:classical music\|Classical music]] that it suggests 4\12 or some meantone variant. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)		To me it seems we'd better name it "just major third". The word "classic" is so closely related to [[wikipedia:classical music\|Classical music]] that it suggests 4\12 or some meantone variant. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:55, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

			: We could instead add one ore more of: "octave-reduced 5th harmonic", "harmonic third", "natural third" ... --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)