User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 207:

:::: At the same time, however, only intervals above 25 cents can be reasonably used as melodic intervals, and, the way I see it, commas in the purest sense can't really do that well. Yes, I'm aware that there are limitations to the classic diatonic nomenclature, however, said nomenclature is still needed, even if we must incorporate it into a larger system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

: For now, what about "submajor" and "supraminor" for 26/21 and 63/52? Since there is septendecimal submajor third [[21/17]] and septendecimal supraminor third [[17/14]]. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:29, 22 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:34, 22 September 2020 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,398 edits Suggestion Newer edit →
Line 207:		Line 207:

	:::: At the same time, however, only intervals above 25 cents can be reasonably used as melodic intervals, and, the way I see it, commas in the purest sense can't really do that well. Yes, I'm aware that there are limitations to the classic diatonic nomenclature, however, said nomenclature is still needed, even if we must incorporate it into a larger system. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)		:::: At the same time, however, only intervals above 25 cents can be reasonably used as melodic intervals, and, the way I see it, commas in the purest sense can't really do that well. Yes, I'm aware that there are limitations to the classic diatonic nomenclature, however, said nomenclature is still needed, even if we must incorporate it into a larger system. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

			: For now, what about "submajor" and "supraminor" for 26/21 and 63/52? Since there is septendecimal submajor third [[21/17]] and septendecimal supraminor third [[17/14]]. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 02:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)