Talk:19edo: Difference between revisions
re (pro) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I like the percentages in the Errors table, but I think showing hundredths of a percentage point gives the reader far too much information. I would prefer to see 0%, -11%, -12%, -34%, +27%, -31%. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 05:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | I like the percentages in the Errors table, but I think showing hundredths of a percentage point gives the reader far too much information. I would prefer to see 0%, -11%, -12%, -34%, +27%, -31%. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 05:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I agree in this. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | : I agree in this. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: I'd still like to have one decimal place. It's a convenient way to check whether an interval is consistent. Here's a case where you can't with such precision. 15/11 in 19edo: -27-(-11-12)% = -50%. An additional decimal place practically keeps such occurence away. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC) | |||