Talk:5/3/WikispacesArchive: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
 
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018

ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW

All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page. All new discussion should go on Talk:5/3.


A slightly narrow major sixth?

I think this is an absurd characterization. Shall we also call 3/2 a very slightly wide perfect fifth?

- genewardsmith September 29, 2011, 03:51:10 PM UTC-0700


I am not attached to that characterization. "Narrow" is a relative term. I was thinking of the two major sixths that appear in the 5-limit, the other being 26/16. 5/3 is clearly the narrower. However, just to call it narrow without reference to anything is kind of silly, if not absurd as you say. So I'll go ahead and change it.

- Andrew_Heathwaite September 29, 2011, 03:59:12 PM UTC-0700