15edo/Interval names: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|LM2 | |LM2 | ||
|M2 | |M2 | ||
|Serd | |Serd* | ||
|8/7, 7/6, 9/8 | |8/7, 7/6, 9/8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
|6 | |6 | ||
|480 | |480 | ||
| | |Sub 4th | ||
|P4 | |P4 | ||
|w4 | |w4 | ||
| Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
|SM7 | |SM7 | ||
|m7 | |m7 | ||
| | |Sinth* | ||
|7/4, 12/7, 16/9 | |7/4, 12/7, 16/9 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 204: | Line 204: | ||
|2/1 | |2/1 | ||
|} | |} | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>'Serd' and 'Sinth' are Portmanteaux of Second and Third; and Sixth and Seventh respectively. These intervals represent exact half Perfect 4ths and Perfect 5ths, and replace the "regular" interval name. I have put them in there to gain functionality at the cost of losing familiarity/introducing novelty in addition to 'HO', the half-octave. My (Gareth's) system at this stage is the same as Dave Keenan's but for the addition of these. I suppose they could just be optional additional names for those steps. I was led to this after not finding any reason to change Dave's system, but not liking that it led to A2/d3 for the 240c interval in 5n-edos, and A6/d7 for the 960c interval. Seems weird. | |||
I like Igs' and Dave's systems the best I think. They are very different. | |||