Talk:5/3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikispaces>FREEZE No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW = | = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW = | ||
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' | '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' | ||
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS ABOVE THIS SECTION. Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
A slightly narrow major sixth?
I think this is an absurd characterization. Shall we also call 3/2 a very slightly wide perfect fifth?
- genewardsmith September 29, 2011, 03:51:10 PM UTC-0700
I am not attached to that characterization. "Narrow" is a relative term. I was thinking of the two major sixths that appear in the 5-limit, the other being 26/16. 5/3 is clearly the narrower. However, just to call it narrow without reference to anything is kind of silly, if not absurd as you say. So I'll go ahead and change it.
- Andrew_Heathwaite September 29, 2011, 03:59:12 PM UTC-0700