Talk:Ed4: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>FREEZE No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW = | = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW = | ||
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' | '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' | ||
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS ABOVE THIS SECTION. Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
'Double Octave'
Hi Andrew, 'Double Octave' sounds like a 16/1 ratio. Why not Quadruplave? Quadruplave sounds more consistent for designate the 4/1 ratio. Is not 'Octave' the same thing that 'Eighth', the equivalent to 8/1 ratio?
I and others stop referring to the frequential duple (or Duplave) as the 'Octave', since it is a tremendous inconsistency for technical reference in the designation of harmonic ratios.
The list of ratios 'x/1' can be:
1/1 - Unison, 'Monoave'
2/1 - Duple, Duplave
3/1 - Triple, Tritave
4/1 - Quadruple, Quadruplave, 'Quadruve'
5/1 - Qintuple, Pentave, (Fifth?)
6/1 - Sixtuple, Hexave, (Sixth?)
7/1 - Septuple, Heptave, (Seventh?)
8/1 - Octuple, <legitimally Octave>, (Eighth?)
9/1 - Enneatuple, Nonave, (Ninth?)
10/1 - Decatuple, Decave, (Tenth?)
11/1 - Undecatuple, Undecave, (Eleventh?)
12/1 - Dodecatuple, Dodecave, (Twelfth?)
13/1 - Tredecatuple, Tredecave, (Thirteenth?)
14/1 - Quardecatuple, Quardecave, (Fourteenth?)
What do you think?
???'????'
- Osmiorisbendi November 19, 2011, 08:59:51 PM UTC-0800
I think "Double Octave" is perfectly clear, and have seen other people refer to the "Double Octave" before. Yes, "octave" is something of a misnomer, and from a certain point of view, "duple" makes a lot more sense -- but everybody knows what an octave is -- it's still a standard name for the 2/1. I've also heard "triple octave" -- referring to 8/1 ratio -- and I think that's just as clear. However, I'm not opposed to Quadruple as an additional name. I don't like Quadruplave or Quadruve at all, but would not object to their inclusion. However, I wouldn't want to take away "double octave".
- Andrew_Heathwaite November 21, 2011, 07:39:39 PM UTC-0800