Talk:3645/3584: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Unque (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


:::: I do agree this is a kind of diesis, but I think the new name should solve the name for the corresponding temperament too. ''Meantone diesis'' is indeed not very clear, as it may refer to the d2 in meantone. So, I suggest ''abercomma''/''aberdiesis'', cuz this interval is a Pythagorean comma + an aberschisma. The temperament? ''Abercommic''/''aberdietic'', I suppose. (I don't feel strongly about comma vs diesis here tho it should be noted it's smaller than Sagittal's range of a diesis. Not that I treat Sagittal as an absolute authority but still.) —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 20:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
:::: I do agree this is a kind of diesis, but I think the new name should solve the name for the corresponding temperament too. ''Meantone diesis'' is indeed not very clear, as it may refer to the d2 in meantone. So, I suggest ''abercomma''/''aberdiesis'', cuz this interval is a Pythagorean comma + an aberschisma. The temperament? ''Abercommic''/''aberdietic'', I suppose. (I don't feel strongly about comma vs diesis here tho it should be noted it's smaller than Sagittal's range of a diesis. Not that I treat Sagittal as an absolute authority but still.) —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 20:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
::::: I like ''aberdiesis'', especially since 3645/3584 the enharmonic diesis in aberschismic temperament.  I tend to assume this as a structural meaning rather than size-based, especially because Sagittal's range of diesis excludes the Pythagorean comma for some strange reason, despite that interval being the absolute 'de facto' diesis of the 3-limit. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 20:24, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Return to "3645/3584" page.