Talk:847/845: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::: The 5.7.11.13 subgroup is interesting mostly because it lacks primes 2 and 3, but also because of its structure. 847/845 is by far the smallest comma of any reasonable complexity, and it's extremely natural to temper it out, which makes it very important in this subgroup. I'm not treating 125/121 and 175/169 like commas, but they're right next to each other and it's relevant that they're separated by 847/845. It's not simpler than (7/5)/(13/11)<sup>2</sup>, but it's still an important result of tempering it out in its subgroup. [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 02:26, 20 May 2026 (UTC) | ::: The 5.7.11.13 subgroup is interesting mostly because it lacks primes 2 and 3, but also because of its structure. 847/845 is by far the smallest comma of any reasonable complexity, and it's extremely natural to temper it out, which makes it very important in this subgroup. I'm not treating 125/121 and 175/169 like commas, but they're right next to each other and it's relevant that they're separated by 847/845. It's not simpler than (7/5)/(13/11)<sup>2</sup>, but it's still an important result of tempering it out in its subgroup. [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 02:26, 20 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::: > The 5.7.11.13 subgroup is interesting mostly because it lacks primes 2 and 3, but also because of its structure. | |||
:::: > it's relevant that [125/121 and 175/169] are separated by 847/845. | |||
:::: > it's still an important result of tempering it out in its subgroup. | |||
:::: Maybe stop begging the question all the time. Provide substances to your arguments. | |||
:::: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:23, 22 May 2026 (UTC) | |||