Talk:847/845: Difference between revisions
→As (125/121)/(175/169)?: signature Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Re |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: I did some number crunching; turns out that 125/121 and 175/169 are actually the simplest two intervals (by factor count) smaller than 100 cents, and they differ by 847/845. The next two (aside from 847/845 itself) ALSO differ by 847/845. [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 00:20, 7 May 2026 (UTC) | : I did some number crunching; turns out that 125/121 and 175/169 are actually the simplest two intervals (by factor count) smaller than 100 cents, and they differ by 847/845. The next two (aside from 847/845 itself) ALSO differ by 847/845. [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 00:20, 7 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: 125/121 and 175/169 are quartertone-sized yet they should be treated as commas by default? I don't see why. And considering them in the 5.7.11.13 subgroup should imply this subgroup is of some significance in the first place, which is yet to be proven. The rastma is described in terms of significant intervals that belong to significant subgroups. It's the plain opposite with what we have here. Given the current state I think it's at best a trivia for the curious and at worst actively unhelpful cuz users are unlikely to be familiar with those intervals. The best way to get to 847/845 is already shown: (7/5)/(13/11)<sup>2</sup>, and no alternatives can be as clear as that. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:51, 7 May 2026 (UTC) | |||