Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:39, 13 February 2026 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,011 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:27, 16 February 2026 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,411 edits m suggestion Newer edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:

	: If enough people want to, then I guess. I like the current name of this comma, and I was thinking of the associated full 7-limit temperament being "argentic" and the 2.3.7/5 subgroup one being "argic". [[User:Tristanbay\|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay\|talk]]) 06:12, 27 January 2026 (UTC)		: If enough people want to, then I guess. I like the current name of this comma, and I was thinking of the associated full 7-limit temperament being "argentic" and the 2.3.7/5 subgroup one being "argic". [[User:Tristanbay\|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay\|talk]]) 06:12, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

			: Why not [[64/63\|S8]]/[[81/80\|S9]]? Are there many properties of this comma that aren't explained by it being ((8/7)/(9/8)) / ((9/8)/(10/9)) = (64/63) / (81/80) and hence ([[10/7]])/([[9/8]])<sup>3</sup>? --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 12:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)