User:Moremajorthanmajor/Ed9/4: Difference between revisions
Beginning process of improving page |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Editable user page}} | {{Editable user page}} | ||
The '''equal division of 9/4''' ('''ed9/4''') is a [[tuning]] obtained by dividing the [[9/4|Pythagorean ninth (9/4)]] in a certain number of [[equal]] steps | The '''equal division of 9/4''' ('''ed9/4''') is a [[tuning]] obtained by dividing the [[9/4|Pythagorean ninth (9/4)]] in a certain number of [[equal]] steps. | ||
== Properties == | == Properties == | ||
=== Relation to edfs === | |||
An ed9/4 can be generated by taking every other tone of an [[edf]], so even-numbered ed9/4's are integer edfs. | |||
This is the primary use for ed9/4s — to get the same benefits of a particular edf, without having to juggle such a large number of notes per [[period]]. This is a similar principle to using an [[ed4]] in place of a very large [[edo]]. | |||
Perhaps a composer wanting to explore ''N''edf but daunted by the number of notes, could instead simply use ''N''ed9/4. Otherwise, they could also compose for two instruments, both tuned to ''N''ed9/4, but each tuned one step of ''N''edf apart, making the piece overall in ''N''edf, but each individual instrument ''N''ed9/4. This is a similar strategy to how some composers have approached [[24edo]] — using two [[12edo]] instruments tuned a 24edo-step apart. | |||
=== Relation to common practice === | |||
9/4 or another major ninth is a standard replacement for the root in jazz piano voicings. Perhaps, then, a composer could approach the period of ed9/4 not as an [[equivalence]], but as a skeleton for chords to be built out of. | |||
=== Equivalence === | |||
Few would argue that 9/4 itself could be heard as an equivalence. Some might argue that some degree of 3/2 equivalence may be possible in a scale which has no 2/1, 3/1, or 4/1, though this is quite controversial. If that is the case, then perhaps in a similar scale that also has no 3/2, 9/4 may have some form of faint equivalence as it might sound like two periods of 3/2. | |||
== Individual pages for ed9/4's == | == Individual pages for ed9/4's == |
Revision as of 01:24, 22 May 2025
![]() |
This user page is editable by any wiki editor.
As a general rule, most users expect their user space to be edited only by themselves, except for minor edits (e.g. maintenance), undoing obviously harmful edits such as vandalism or disruptive editing, and user talk pages. However, by including this message box, the author of this user page has indicated that this page is open to contributions from other users (e.g. content-related edits). |
The equal division of 9/4 (ed9/4) is a tuning obtained by dividing the Pythagorean ninth (9/4) in a certain number of equal steps.
Properties
Relation to edfs
An ed9/4 can be generated by taking every other tone of an edf, so even-numbered ed9/4's are integer edfs.
This is the primary use for ed9/4s — to get the same benefits of a particular edf, without having to juggle such a large number of notes per period. This is a similar principle to using an ed4 in place of a very large edo.
Perhaps a composer wanting to explore Nedf but daunted by the number of notes, could instead simply use Ned9/4. Otherwise, they could also compose for two instruments, both tuned to Ned9/4, but each tuned one step of Nedf apart, making the piece overall in Nedf, but each individual instrument Ned9/4. This is a similar strategy to how some composers have approached 24edo — using two 12edo instruments tuned a 24edo-step apart.
Relation to common practice
9/4 or another major ninth is a standard replacement for the root in jazz piano voicings. Perhaps, then, a composer could approach the period of ed9/4 not as an equivalence, but as a skeleton for chords to be built out of.
Equivalence
Few would argue that 9/4 itself could be heard as an equivalence. Some might argue that some degree of 3/2 equivalence may be possible in a scale which has no 2/1, 3/1, or 4/1, though this is quite controversial. If that is the case, then perhaps in a similar scale that also has no 3/2, 9/4 may have some form of faint equivalence as it might sound like two periods of 3/2.
Individual pages for ed9/4's
1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 19 |
21 | 23 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 31 | 33 | 35 | 37 | 39 |
41 | 43 | 45 | 47 | 49 | 51 | 53 | 55 | 57 | 59 |
61 | 63 | 65 | 67 | 69 | 71 | 73 | 75 | 77 | 79 |
81 | 83 | 85 | 87 | 89 | 91 | 93 | 95 | 97 | 99 |
See also