Talk:Periodic scale: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The latter form is implicit when regarding scales as scale words. | The latter form is implicit when regarding scales as scale words. | ||
We | We could also mention scales considered more abstractly, <math>S: \mathbb{Z}\to A</math> where ''A'' is any torsion-free abelian group such as <math>\mathbb{R}</math> (log-frequency interval space), a free abelian group on steps, or a JI subgroup. | ||
[[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC) | [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 8 February 2024
The step form of a scale
I'd like the page to mention the two ways of writing a periodic scale as a function:
- The cumulative form (the formalization in the article), a monotone increasing function [math]\displaystyle{ S: \mathbb{Z}\to \mathbb{R} }[/math] such that S(0) = 0 (unison) and S(k + len(S)) = S(k) + E where E is the equave.
- The step form, the sequence of steps in the scale, related to the above via ΔS(k) = S(k + 1) − S(k), which is nonnegative and periodic in the usual math sense.
The latter form is implicit when regarding scales as scale words.
We could also mention scales considered more abstractly, [math]\displaystyle{ S: \mathbb{Z}\to A }[/math] where A is any torsion-free abelian group such as [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R} }[/math] (log-frequency interval space), a free abelian group on steps, or a JI subgroup. Inthar (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)