Distributional evenness: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Distinguish|Maximal evenness}}
{{Distinguish|Maximal evenness}}
A scale with two step sizes is '''distributionally even''' ('''DE''') if it has its two step sizes distributed as evenly as possible. This turns out to be equivalent to the property of having [[maximum variety]] 2; that is, each [[interval class]] ("seconds", "thirds", and so on) contains no more than two sizes.
A scale with two step sizes is '''distributionally even''' ('''DE''') if it has its two step sizes distributed as evenly as possible (i.e. each step size is distributed in a [[maximal evenness|maximally even]] pattern among the steps of the scale). This turns out to be equivalent to the property of having [[maximum variety]] 2; that is, each [[interval class]] ("seconds", "thirds", and so on) contains no more than two sizes.


In practice, such scales are often referred to as "[[MOS scale]]s", but some consider this usage to be technically incorrect because a MOS as defined by [[Erv Wilson]] was to have ''exactly'' two specific intervals for each class other than multiples of the octave. When Wilson discovered MOS scales and found numerous examples, DE scales with period a fraction of an octave such as [[pajara]], [[augmented]], [[diminished]], etc. were not among them.
In practice, such scales are often referred to as "[[MOS scale]]s", but some consider this usage to be technically incorrect because a MOS as defined by [[Erv Wilson]] was to have ''exactly'' two specific intervals for each class other than multiples of the octave. When Wilson discovered MOS scales and found numerous examples, DE scales with period a fraction of an octave such as [[pajara]], [[augmented]], [[diminished]], etc. were not among them.

Revision as of 00:52, 25 August 2023

Not to be confused with Maximal evenness.

A scale with two step sizes is distributionally even (DE) if it has its two step sizes distributed as evenly as possible (i.e. each step size is distributed in a maximally even pattern among the steps of the scale). This turns out to be equivalent to the property of having maximum variety 2; that is, each interval class ("seconds", "thirds", and so on) contains no more than two sizes.

In practice, such scales are often referred to as "MOS scales", but some consider this usage to be technically incorrect because a MOS as defined by Erv Wilson was to have exactly two specific intervals for each class other than multiples of the octave. When Wilson discovered MOS scales and found numerous examples, DE scales with period a fraction of an octave such as pajara, augmented, diminished, etc. were not among them.

Definition and generalization

Distributional evenness has an obvious generalization to scales of arbitrary arity: we simply extend the consideration of evenly distributing each step size to every step size of an arbitrary scale.

Formally, let r ≥ 2 and let S be an r-ary periodic scale with length n (i.e. S(kn) = kP where P is the period), with step sizes x1, ..., xr, i.e. such that ΔS(i) := S(i+1) − S(i) ∈ {x1, ..., xr} ∀iZ. For each i ∈ {1, ..., r}, define Ti = (ΔS)−1(xi), naturally viewed as a subset of Z/nZ. The scale S is distributionally even if for every i ∈ {1, ..., r}, Ti is a maximally even MOS in Z/nZ. (For the original definition of DE, simply set r = 2.)

Using this definition, an r-ary scale word in x1, ..., xr is DE if and only if for every i ∈ {1, ..., r}, the binary scale obtained by equating all step sizes except xi is DE.