496edo: Difference between revisions
→Theory: cleanup |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ET}} | {{novelty}}{{stub}}{{Infobox ET}} | ||
{{EDO intro|496}} | {{EDO intro|496}} | ||
==Theory== | ==Theory== |
Revision as of 05:44, 9 July 2023
![]() |
This page presents a novelty topic.
It may contain ideas which are less likely to find practical applications in music, or numbers or structures that are arbitrary or exceedingly small, large, or complex. Novelty topics are often developed by a single person or a small group. As such, this page may also contain idiosyncratic terms, notation, or conceptual frameworks. |
![]() |
This page is a stub. You can help the Xenharmonic Wiki by expanding it. |
← 495edo | 496edo | 497edo → |
Theory
496edo is strongly related to the 248edo, but the patent vals differ on the mapping for 13. As such, in the 11-limit it supports a compound of two chains of 11-limit bischismic temperaments. In the 13-limit patent val, first step where 496edo is not contorted, it tempers out 4225/4224.
496edo is good with the 2.3.11.19 subgroup, for low-complexity just intonation. Higher limits that it appreciates are 31, 37, and 47. In the 2.3.11.19 subgroup, 496edo tempers out 131072/131043.
496 is the 3rd perfect number, and its divisors are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248, the most notable being 31.
Odd harmonics
Harmonic | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 19 | 21 | 23 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Error | Absolute (¢) | -0.34 | +0.78 | -1.08 | -0.68 | +0.29 | -1.01 | +0.44 | -0.92 | +0.07 | +0.99 | +0.76 |
Relative (%) | -14.1 | +32.4 | -44.8 | -28.3 | +12.2 | -41.8 | +18.2 | -38.2 | +2.8 | +41.1 | +31.3 | |
Steps (reduced) |
786 (290) |
1152 (160) |
1392 (400) |
1572 (84) |
1716 (228) |
1835 (347) |
1938 (450) |
2027 (43) |
2107 (123) |
2179 (195) |
2244 (260) |