User:CritDeathX/Sam's Idea Of Consonance: Difference between revisions
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Okay, so a while back, I had developed this method of finding how consonant a chord was. The basic idea was to find how many combination/difference tones lined up with a chord | Okay, so a while back, I had developed this method of finding how consonant a chord was. The basic idea was to find how many combination/difference tones lined up with a chord. | ||
== Linear Tones == | |||
=== Formula === | |||
In order to find what tones line up with the chord, the resulting tone must either be | In order to find what tones line up with the chord, the resulting tone must either be | ||
# The number up/down whatever octaves [h*(2^x)]. (''e.g., 1/4, 3/6, 26/13'') | # The number up/down whatever octaves [h*(2^x)]. (''e.g., 1/4, 3/6, 26/13'') | ||
| Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
Thus, by these rules, it cannot line up if it results in any other harmonic/interval. | Thus, by these rules, it cannot line up if it results in any other harmonic/interval. | ||
=== Demonstration === | |||
I'll show an example of what I mean using 4:5:6. | I'll show an example of what I mean using 4:5:6. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 57: | ||
''etc...'' | ''etc...'' | ||
An interesting thing to note is that after the 5-note chord, the amount of times that the tones line up rises linearly by 2x. | An interesting thing to note is that after the 5-note chord, the amount of times that the linear tones line up rises linearly by 2x. | ||
To show an example of this method with the added reference, I'll show how 9:11:13 works here. | To show an example of this method with the added reference, I'll show how 9:11:13 works here. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
We then compare it to the 3-note reference point, 4:5:6. 4:5:6's tones line up 4 times, and 9:11:13's tones line up 4 times as well. By this conclusion, 9:11:13 should be as consonant as 4:5:6. (''its also proportional like 4:5:6, so take that as you will'') | We then compare it to the 3-note reference point, 4:5:6. 4:5:6's tones line up 4 times, and 9:11:13's tones line up 4 times as well. By this conclusion, 9:11:13 should be as consonant as 4:5:6. (''its also proportional like 4:5:6, so take that as you will'') | ||
I should note that they may not ''sound'' consonant on first listen, but if you were to hear it for a long enough time, you'd notice how ''weirdly'' consonant they are. I think this might be a useful method for finding alien harmonies without sacrificing the idea of consonance entirely. | |||
== Harmonal Limits == | |||
This is a term that I'm coining to describe certain patterns or outliers within a series of chords or a scale(s) based off of their linear tones. | |||
=== Chord Progressions === | |||
Here's [[:File:Erv Wilson's Fibonnaci Progression.png|an example progression using a Fibonnaci sequence from Erv Wilson's letter to McLaren]]. We can look at the linear tones of these chords and see whether we can notice anything interesting: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!1st chord | |||
!2 | |||
!3 | |||
!4 | |||
!5 | |||
!6 | |||
!7 | |||
!8 | |||
|- | |||
|8 | |||
|8 | |||
|9 | |||
|8 | |||
|8 | |||
|8 | |||
|8 | |||
|10 | |||
|} | |||
Although its hard to figure out how to represent harmonal limits, I think the best way to do it is to have ([lowest number of unique notes in a chord]-[highest]) on the denominator and have ([lowest linear tone]-[highest]) on the denominator. In this case, it would look like (8-10)/(3-4), which if we were to translate this into a proper number it would equal 2. | |||
=== Singular Chords === | |||
When it comes to just one chord, though, it'd be best to rely on which note most of the linear tones are found. For example, 9:11:13 in the last headliner had most of its linear tones occur on 9, so since 3 linear tones appeared on 9, we can say that the harmonal limit for this chord is 3. | |||