Talk:217edo: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Overthink (talk | contribs)
m subst to remove script error category (though template is deprecated)
Tag: Reverted
Overthink (talk | contribs)
m Undo revision 229326 by Overthink (talk) nvm not needed
Tag: Undo
 
Line 2: Line 2:


What about using <code><nowiki>{{Primes in edo|217|columns=11|prec=3}}</nowiki></code> instead? It renders to:
What about using <code><nowiki>{{Primes in edo|217|columns=11|prec=3}}</nowiki></code> instead? It renders to:
<strong class="error"><span class="scribunto-error mw-scribunto-error-928366ad">Script error: No such module &quot;primes_in_edo&quot;.</span></strong>
{{Primes in edo|217|columns=11|prec=3}}
Its relative errors are rounded to integer percentages but this is often considered sufficient. In the case of <code>1% of 1\217</code> being actually 0.055 cents, it may be overkill to add 2 decimals. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Its relative errors are rounded to integer percentages but this is often considered sufficient. In the case of <code>1% of 1\217</code> being actually 0.055 cents, it may be overkill to add 2 decimals. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:05, 2 May 2026

Prime intervals

What about using {{Primes in edo|217|columns=11|prec=3}} instead? It renders to: Script error: No such module "primes_in_edo". Its relative errors are rounded to integer percentages but this is often considered sufficient. In the case of 1% of 1\217 being actually 0.055 cents, it may be overkill to add 2 decimals. --Xenwolf (talk) 10:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)