Talk:147edo: Difference between revisions

Squib (talk | contribs)
Created page with "is it worth mentioning that 147edo tempers out 3489660928/3486784401 in the 2.3.13 subgroup? in the way of technical data, there's nothing in the section about its 2.3.13.23 subgroup that isn't also true of shoal. ~~~~"
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
is it worth mentioning that 147edo tempers out 3489660928/3486784401 in the 2.3.13 subgroup? in the way of technical data, there's nothing in the section about its 2.3.13.23 subgroup that isn't also true of shoal. [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 15:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
is it worth mentioning that 147edo tempers out 3489660928/3486784401 in the 2.3.13 subgroup? in the way of technical data, there's nothing in the section about its 2.3.13.23 subgroup that isn't also true of shoal. [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 15:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
: What does this comma exactly represent? [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 02:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
:: It equates [[16/13]] with ([[256/243]])<sup>4</sup>. Apparently it's tempered out by 53edo too (which also has a strong 2.3.13) so should it get its own page? [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 05:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
::: This comma has a name already, called ''tridecapyth comma''. It simply maps prime 13 to twenty perfect fifths, and cassandra, which 147et supports, tempers it out. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Return to "147edo" page.