User:Inthar/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Theorem 5 ==
== Theorem 9 (Ternary product words) ==
If a balanced scale is odd and is not a Fraenkel word, then it is SGA.
If a [[product word]] of two MOS words of the same length is ternary, then it is pairwise-MOS.
=== Proof ===
=== Proof ===
Assume that the product of two MOS words ''v''('''a''', '''b''') and ''w''('''c''', '''d''') contains exactly three letters, say ('''a''', '''c'''), ('''a''', '''d'''), ('''b''', '''c'''). Equating ('''a''', '''c''') and ('''a''', '''d''') recovers ''v'', and equating ('''a''', '''c''') and ('''b''', '''c''') recovers ''w''. What does equating ('''a''', '''d''') and ('''b''', '''c''') do?

Latest revision as of 03:24, 3 January 2026

Theorem 9 (Ternary product words)

If a product word of two MOS words of the same length is ternary, then it is pairwise-MOS.

Proof

Assume that the product of two MOS words v(a, b) and w(c, d) contains exactly three letters, say (a, c), (a, d), (b, c). Equating (a, c) and (a, d) recovers v, and equating (a, c) and (b, c) recovers w. What does equating (a, d) and (b, c) do?