User:VIxen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
My preferred method of creating scales, at least of starting this creation, is regular temperament theory, though I see its limitations. | My preferred method of creating scales, at least of starting this creation, is regular temperament theory, though I see its limitations. | ||
[[User:VIxen/Scales|Scales]] | [[User:VIxen/Scales|Scales]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:VIxen/Code|Code]] | [[User:VIxen/Code|Code]] | ||
[[User:VIxen/Table_of_sensipent_intervals|Table of sensipent[19] intervals]] | |||
[[User:VIxen/Table_of_orson_intervals|Table of orson[22] intervals]] | |||
[[User:VIxen/Cemetery|Cemetery (for text that used to be in the mainspace)]] | |||
Discord: @xencoder | Discord: @xencoder | ||
Latest revision as of 18:50, 18 May 2025
I am rather new to musical practice and yet to start composing. When I do, I will likely use physical modeling synths to compose complex polyphonic harmonies and polyrhythms, a sort of jazzy avant-garde metal or dark ambient.
I have no musical education, am a math BSc instead, so I think about music theory in terms of pitch frequencies, JI groups and other rather abstract math and physics, instead of the common-practice theory that I am rather unfamiliar with.
My preferred method of creating scales, at least of starting this creation, is regular temperament theory, though I see its limitations.
Table of sensipent[19] intervals
Cemetery (for text that used to be in the mainspace)
Discord: @xencoder