Xenharmonic Wiki

MOS step ratio spectrum: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Inthar (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
15,004 edits
Inthar (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
15,004 edits
shorter title
Tag: New redirect
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The melodic sound of a [[MOS]] is not just affected by the tuning of its intervals, but by the sizes of its steps. MOSes with L more similar to s sound smoother and more mellow. MOSes with L much larger than s sound jagged and dramatic. The ''step ratio'', the ratio between the sizes of L and s, is thus important to the sound of the scale.
#redirect [[Step ratio]]
 
= Relative interval sizes =
 
Part of this perception stems from the fact that, as these L:s ratios change and pass certain critical rational values, the *next* MOS in the sequence changes structure entirely. For instance, when we have L:s > 2, the next MOS changes from "xLys" to "yLxs." As an example, with the "5L2s" diatonic MOS, if we have L/s < 2, the next MOS will be "7L5s," and if we have L/s > 2, the next MOS will be "5L7s." (At the point L/s = 2, we have that the next MOS is an equal temperament.)
 
Similar things happen with *all* of these rational points. As the L:s ratio decreases and passes 3/2, for instance, the MOS that is *two* steps after the current one changes. Again, as an example, with the familiar 5L2s diatonic MOS sequence, if we have 3:2 < L:s < 2:1, the next two MOS's have 19 and 31 notes, whereas if we have L:s < 3:2, the next two MOS's have 19 and 26 notes.
 
Another way to look at this is using [[Rothenberg propriety]]: it so happens that, with one small exception, if a MOS has L:s < 2:1, it is "strictly proper", if it has L:s > 2:1, it is "improper", and if it has L:s = 2:1, it is "proper," all using Rothenberg's definition. The one exception is if the MOS has a single small step (e.g. it is of the form xL1s), at which point it is always "strictly proper." Similarly we pass the L:s 3:2 boundary, the *next* MOS changes from strictly proper to improper, and so on.
 
The special ratio L:s = phi is unique in that it is the only ratio in which the MOS is strictly proper, and all of the following MOS's are also strictly proper.
 
= TAMNAMS Naming System =
 
== Ratio Spectrum ==
 
We in the discord have named nine specific simple L:s ratios.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Step ratio names
!TAMNAMS Name
!Ratio
!Diatonic example
|-
|Equalized
|L:s = 1:1
|7edo
|-
|Supersoft
|L:s = 4:3
|26edo
|-
|Soft
|L:s = 3:2
|19edo
|-
|Semisoft
|L:s = 5:3
|31edo
|-
|Basic (or quintessential)
|L:s = 2:1
|12edo
|-
|Semihard
|L:s = 5:2
|29edo
|-
|Hard
|L:s = 3:1
|17edo
|-
|Superhard
|L:s = 4:1
|22edo
|-
|Paucitonic (from "few tones")
|L:s = 1:0
|5edo
|}
For example, the 5L2s (diatonic) scale of 19edo has a step ratio of 3:2, which is "soft". We call the 19edo diatonic scale "soft diatonic". Tunings of a MOS with L:s larger are "harder", and tunings with L:s smaller are "softer".
 
The two extremes, equalized and paucitonic, are degenerate cases. An equalized MOS has L equal to s, so the MOS pattern is no longer apparent. A paucitonic MOS has s = 0, merging adjacent tones s apart into a single tone. In both cases, the MOS structure is no longer valid.
 
In between the nine specific ratios there are eight ranges of ratios. Each range has a name. These names are useful for classifying MOS tunings which don't match any of the nine simple step ratios. ''Hypohard'' could be used for tunings that are harder than basic but not as hard as the 3:1 tuning; similarly, ''hyposoft'' can be used for the range between soft and basic.
 
By default, all ranges include their endpoints. For example, a hard tuning is considered a quasihard tuning. To exclude endpoints, the modifier "strict" can be used, for example "strict hyposoft".
{| class="wikitable"
|+Intermediate ranges
!TAMNAMS Name
!Range
|-
|Ultrasoft
|1:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 4:3
|-
|Parasoft
|4:3 ≤ L:s ≤ 3:2
|-
|Quasisoft
|3:2 ≤ L:s ≤ 5:3
|-
|Minisoft
|5:3 ≤ L:s ≤ 2:1
|-
|Minihard
|2:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 5:2
|-
|Quasihard
|5:2 ≤ L:s ≤ 3:1
|-
|Parahard
|3:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 4:1
|-
|Ultrahard
|4:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 1:0
|}
 
=== Derivation ===
The idea is to start with the simplest ratios (L/s = 1/0 and L/s = 1/1) and derive more complex ratios through repeated application of the [[mediant]] (aka Farey addition) to adjacent fractions.
 
* Applying the mediant to the starting intervals 1/0 and 1/1 gives (1+1)/(1+0) = 2/1, and as this is the simplest possible ratio where the large and small step are distinguished and nonzero, it is called the "quintessential" ("quintess." or "essential" for short) or "basic" tuning. (Note that if applying the mediant to 1/0 seems confusing, think of it as equivalent to applying the mediant to 0/1 and 1/1 and the ratios as flipped, thus representing s/L rather than L/s when written this way.)
 
* As L/s = 1/1 represents L and s being equal in size, it is called "equalized".
 
* As L/s = 1/0 represents s = 0, it is called "paucitonic", meaning "few tones", as the resulting scale is also equalized but with fewer tones per period than expected.
 
* The mediant of 1/1 and 2/1 is 3/2, thus making the scale sound mellower/softer, and as this is the simplest (in the sense of lowest [[Odd limit#Relationship_to_other_limits|integer limit]]) ratio to represent such a property, it is simply called the "soft" tuning.
 
* Analogously, the mediant of 2/1 and 1/0, 3/1, is called the "hard" tuning. Thus you can say that a step ratio tuning is "hard of" or "soft of" another step ratio tuning.
 
* To get something between soft and basic we take the mediant again and get 5/3 for "semisoft", and analogously 5/2 for "semihard". To get something more extreme we take the mediant of 1/0 with 3/1 for a harder-than-hard tuning, giving us 4/1 for "superhard" and analogously 4/3 for "supersoft".
 
There are also tertiary names beyond the above:
 
* Anything softer than supersoft is "ultrasoft," and anything harder than superhard is "ultrahard". Something between soft and supersoft is "parasoft", as "para-" means both "beyond" and "next to". Something between hard and superhard is "parahard".
 
* Something between soft and basic is "hyposoft" as it is less soft than soft. Something between hard and basic is "hypohard" for the same reason. Between semisoft and quintessential is "minisoft" and between semihard and quintessential is "minihard".
 
* Finally, between soft and semisoft is "quasisoft" as such scales may potentially be mistaken for soft or semisoft while not being either - hence the use of the prefix "quasi-", and between hard and semihard is "quasihard" for the same reason.
 
The reasoning for the "para- super- ultra-" progression (note that "super-" is the odd one out as it refers to an exact ratio) is it mirrors naming for shades of musical intervals and because "parapythagorean" is between "pythagorean" and "superpythagorean".
 
This results in the "central spectrum" below - an elegant system which names all exact L/s ratios in the 5-integer-limit excepting only 5/1 and 5/4 which are disincluded intentionally for a variety of reasons: to keep the maximum corresponding notes per period in an [[EPD|equal pitch division]] low, because it keeps the 'tree' of mediants complete to a certain number of layers, and because their disinclusion gives a roughly-equally-spaced set of ratios, with the regions between 4/3 and 1/1 and between 4/1 and 1/0 being the only exceptions - corresponding to extreme tunings. Note that filling in those extreme regions is the purpose of the extended spectrum, detailed after.
 
=== Central spectrum ===
'''Equalized''': L/s = 1/1 (trivial/pathological)
 
::: ('''Ultrasoft''' range here, may also be called "pseudoequalized" if especially close to equalized.)
 
:: '''Supersoft''': L/s = 4/3
 
::: ('''Parasoft''' range here.)
 
: '''Soft''': L/s = 3/2
 
::: (Beginning of '''hyposoft''' range here.)
 
::: ('''Quasisoft''' range here.)
 
:: '''Semisoft''': L/s = 5/3
 
::: ('''Minisoft''' range here.)
 
::: (End of '''hyposoft''' range here.)
 
'''Quintesssential''': L/s = 2/1
 
::: (Beginning of '''hypohard''' range here.)
 
::: ('''Minihard''' range here.)
 
:: '''Semihard''': L/s = 5/2
 
::: ('''Quasihard''' range here.)
 
::: (End of '''hypohard''' range here.)
 
: '''Hard''': L/s = 3/1
 
::: ('''Parahard''' range here.)
 
:: '''Superhard''': L/s = 4/1
 
::: ('''Ultrahard''' range here, may also be called "pseudopaucitonic" if especially close to paucitonic.)
 
'''Paucitonic''': L/s = 1/0 = infinity (trivial/pathological)
 
=== Extending the spectrum's edges ===
Extending the spectrum builds on the central spectrum and relies on a few key observations. Firstly, as periods and MOSSes come in wildly different shapes and sizes, and as we want to represent a somewhat representative variety of "simple" tunings for the step ratio for a given MOS pattern and period, the notion of "simple" used will correspond to the number of equally-spaced tones per period required. This is expressed as [number of large steps in pattern]*L + [number of small steps in pattern]*s, where L and s are from the step ratio itself, L/s, and are assumed to be coprime. Then, in order to not introduce bias to MOS patterns with more L's or more s's, we should assume that both are equally likely and thus weight both equally, which means that the resulting minimum number of tones per period for a ratio L/s is L+s. The next observation is that the large values of L/s can be a lot more consequential than the ones close to 1/1 due to the fact that small steps are guaranteed to be smaller than large steps and that we don't know how many small steps there are compared to large steps, and therefore the "hard" end of the spectrum is more vast, and analogously, L/s values close to 1/1 will tend to be inconsequential and for very close values likely impractical to distinguish - in the extremes only serving small tuning adjustments rather than melodic properties. This leads to another observation: MOS patterns with periods tuned to step ratios, while related to temperaments, ''are not'' temperaments - instead forming a sort of amalgamative superset of temperaments if you want to force a temperament interpretation, and thus their main function is in melodic structure, with temperaments informing potential harmonies and microtunings. Thus, the spectrum should be kept minimal and simple so that it is both generally hearable and not too specific.
 
The most obvious adjustment to the edges is to draw a distinction between "ultrasoft" and "pseudoequalized" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semiequalized", and between "ultrahard" and "pseudopaucitonic" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semipaucitonic". Thus:
 
'''Ultrasoft''' is between '''supersoft''' and '''semiequalized''' and '''pseudoequalized''' is between '''semiequalized''' and '''equalized'''.
 
'''Ultrahard''' is between '''superhard''' and '''semipaucitonic''', and '''pseudopaucitonic''' is between '''semipaucitonic''' and '''paucitonic'''.
 
Then all that's left is to decide what the step ratios for semipaucitonic and semiequalized should be. In order to keep the spacing (of the s/L ratios when graphed, or to a lesser extent the L/s ratios if you see the roughly gradual increase in spacing in that form) roughly consistent with all the other ratios, '''semiequalized''' should be L/s = 6/5 rather than L/s = 5/4. Then note the complexity of L/s = 6/5 is 6+5=11, so to find the corresponding complexity for '''semipaucitonic''' we use L/s = 10/1 as 10+1=11 too. Then finally, to preserve some of the symmetry, we include L/s = 6/1 as '''extrahard'''. Although L/s = 10/1 for '''semipaucitonic''' may seem a little extreme of a boundary, L/s = 12/1 would actually be what is the most "equally spaced" continuing on from 6/1 for the same reason that L/s = 6/5 is the most "equally spaced". Note that while the range from '''superhard''' to '''semipaucitonic''' is '''ultrahard''', the region may be split into two sub-ranges:
 
'''superhard''' (L/s=4/1) to '''extrahard''' (L/s=6/1) is '''hyperhard''' (4 < L/s < 6).
 
'''extrahard''' (L/s=6/1) to '''semipaucitonic''' (L/s=10/1) is '''clustered''' (6 < L/s < 10).
 
With the inclusion of these 3 new L/s rations nearer the edges of the spectrum and names for the range divisions they create, we get the extended spectrum, summarised and detailed below, just for the regions affected to avoid repetition.
 
=== Extended spectrum ===
'''Equalized''': L/s = 1/1 (trivial/pathological)
 
::: ('''Pseudoequalized''' range here.)
 
:: '''Semiequalized''': L/s = 6/5
 
::: ('''Ultrasoft''' range here.)
 
:: '''Supersoft''': L/s = 4/3
 
(4/3 < L/s < 4/1 range here, called the '''nonextreme''' range, detailed by central spectrum.)
 
:: '''Superhard''': L/s = 4/1
 
::: (Beginning of '''ultrahard''' range here.)
 
::: ('''Hyperhard''' range here.)
 
:: '''Extrahard''': L/s = 6/1
 
::: ('''Clustered''' range here.)
 
::: (End of '''ultrahard''' range here.)
 
:: '''Semipaucitonic''': L/s = 10/1
 
::: ('''Pseudopaucitonic''' range here.)
 
'''Paucitonic''': L/s = 1/0 = infinity (trivial/pathological)
 
=== Terminology and final notes ===
A ratio of L/s = k/1 can be called ''k-hard'' and a ratio of L/s = k/(k-1) can analogously be called ''k-soft'', so the simplest ultrasoft tuning is 5-soft or "pentasoft", the simplest hyperhard tuning is 5-hard or "pentahard", the simplest clustered tuning is 7-hard or "heptahard", 8-hard is "octahard", 9-hard is "nonahard", and finally, the characteristic simple ultrahard tuning is 6-hard or "extrahard", as previously discussed, which can be seen to be similar to "hexahard" - hopefully helping with memorisation.
 
A perhaps useful (or otherwise mildly amusing) mnemonic is "2-soft is too soft to be hard and 2-hard is too hard to be soft", representing that 2-soft = 2-hard = 2/1 = '''basic'''.
 
Note that often the central spectrum will be sufficient for exploring a MOS pattern-period combination, and the extended spectrum is intended more for (literally) edge cases where it may be useful. Often if a temperament interpretation doesn't seem to show up for a MOS  pattern-period combination, it just means the temperament needs a more complex MOS pattern to narrow down the generator range. An example of this phenomena is the highly complex MOS pattern of [[12L 17s]] represents near-Pythagorean tunings well due to having a generator of a fourth or a fifth bounded between those of [[12edo]] and those of [[29edo]], which are roughly equally off but in opposite directions, and many important near-Pythagorean systems show up in just the ratios of the central spectrum alone.
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/MOS_step_ratio_spectrum"