Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions
Set debug (= uncategorize) for the example here and update the status |
→Make zeta optional: Done |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 226: | Line 226: | ||
: It should be possible, although I will note that only edos are supported in xen-calc (i.e. nonoctave equal tunings are not supported), and large edos will either take a long time to load; for instance, 1000edo just took me 30 seconds to load. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | : It should be possible, although I will note that only edos are supported in xen-calc (i.e. nonoctave equal tunings are not supported), and large edos will either take a long time to load; for instance, 1000edo just took me 30 seconds to load. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Wrong step size at 0EDO == | |||
{{Infobox ET|0edo|debug=1}} | |||
This template shows step size 0 ¢ for 0EDO [[Single-pitch tuning]]. That is wrong because it is either undefined because of division by zero or infinity as a limit of ‹x›EDO for ‹x› going to zero. To be consistent with the article, I think that it should show step size ∞ ¢. The article says “As a result of the step size of 0edo being infinite, the relative error of all intervals is zero.”. | |||
[[User:Matěȷ|Matěȷ]] ([[User talk:Matěȷ|talk]]) 19:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Make zeta optional == | |||
As has been discussed before, I don't believe zeta list status is worth being so prominantly displayed in the infobox. Preferably this information is made opt-in and thereby turned off for most of the edo pages. | |||
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 17:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
: Done. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 18:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC) | |||