Template talk:Harmonics in equal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FilterNashi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
FilterNashi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: When that table displays composite odd harmonics, it maps them by direct approximation rather than by patent val. In 121edo, the patent val mapping (adding up 3 and 7) is over 50% off for odd 21, and therefore the direct approximation (best) mapping for 21 is different. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 12:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC) | : When that table displays composite odd harmonics, it maps them by direct approximation rather than by patent val. In 121edo, the patent val mapping (adding up 3 and 7) is over 50% off for odd 21, and therefore the direct approximation (best) mapping for 21 is different. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 12:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
::kinda misleading though. considering there are different temperaments in one single chart. | ::kinda misleading though. considering there are different temperaments in one single chart. [[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 13:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 24 June 2025
From prime harmonics part (it shows odd harmonics somehow) of 121edo#Theory its steps of 21st harmonic is not by adding 3 and 7, was this on purpose?? FilterNashi (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- When that table displays composite odd harmonics, it maps them by direct approximation rather than by patent val. In 121edo, the patent val mapping (adding up 3 and 7) is over 50% off for odd 21, and therefore the direct approximation (best) mapping for 21 is different. -- Lériendil (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- kinda misleading though. considering there are different temperaments in one single chart. FilterNashi (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)