Talk:Schismatic family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: It's schismic that's non-standard. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC) | : It's schismic that's non-standard. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
:: Schismic is systematic though, and much more common. We don't say "ragismatic" or "kleismatic". And for the family of temperaments (which is only a modern xen concept derived from the historical concept of schismatic temperament), it makes sense to use the systematic name. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 21:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:30, 19 June 2025
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Move to "Schismic family"
-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- VectorGraphics (talk) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Schismic is systematic though, and much more common. We don't say "ragismatic" or "kleismatic". And for the family of temperaments (which is only a modern xen concept derived from the historical concept of schismatic temperament), it makes sense to use the systematic name. -- VectorGraphics (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)