Template talk:Infobox chord: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Sintel (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Sintel (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


: I'm not sure what the benefit would be, since most of the things in the infobox are related to JI. The only thing left would be intervals in cents and consistent edos. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 10:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
: I'm not sure what the benefit would be, since most of the things in the infobox are related to JI. The only thing left would be intervals in cents and consistent edos. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 10:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:: A lot of the autogenerated numbers should support radical expressions, though the subgroup might need to be manually specified.--[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 02:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
::: Ah, I was thinking just supporting cents. Radicals might require quite an overhaul in the code, so I guess it depends on finding someone who wants to dig into that. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:52, 13 May 2025

Add support for radical chords

Currently, the page on the neutral triad can't have an infobox because the hemififth sqrt(3/2) isn't supported in the chord infobox. I would also like to create pages for chords defined in non-just tuning systems. --VectorGraphics (talk) 01:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure what the benefit would be, since most of the things in the infobox are related to JI. The only thing left would be intervals in cents and consistent edos. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 10:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
A lot of the autogenerated numbers should support radical expressions, though the subgroup might need to be manually specified.--VectorGraphics (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Ah, I was thinking just supporting cents. Radicals might require quite an overhaul in the code, so I guess it depends on finding someone who wants to dig into that. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 11:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)