Reticular intonation: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m Todo |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
For entirely practical purposes, however, only the diagonal type contains intervals which have unlimited utility as the base of a scale; a seventh entirely and a sixth partially being too wide to seriously muddy close voicings of triads and a tenth being narrow enough to create a scale which entirely coheres. Incidentally, therefore, 2/1 is not the axis of symmetry of this region, being in fact significantly flat of that interval, itself not even being a simple fraction of 2/1 (although essentially, if not exactly 2 degrees of [[3edt]]). | For entirely practical purposes, however, only the diagonal type contains intervals which have unlimited utility as the base of a scale; a seventh entirely and a sixth partially being too wide to seriously muddy close voicings of triads and a tenth being narrow enough to create a scale which entirely coheres. Incidentally, therefore, 2/1 is not the axis of symmetry of this region, being in fact significantly flat of that interval, itself not even being a simple fraction of 2/1 (although essentially, if not exactly 2 degrees of [[3edt]]). | ||
{{todo|inline=1|review|clarify}} | |||
[[Category:Tuning]] | [[Category:Tuning]] | ||