MOS diagrams: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>guest
**Imported revision 80589251 - Original comment: provided links to thoe original documents**
Xenoindex (talk | contribs)
added link to MOS charts
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
The [[MOS scale|moment-of-symmetry]] process of unfolding a scale takes, for most people, a conceptual leap or two. Below are visualizations of the process:
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:guest|guest]] and made on <tt>2009-07-08 09:52:45 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>80589251</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt>provided links to thoe original documents</tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The moment-of-symmetry process of unfolding a scale takes, for most people, a conceptual leap or two. Best we think about visual ways of bridging the leap.


* The first set of 32 horograms can be found here. [[http://anaphoria.com/hrgm.PDF]]An excellent introduction by David Finnamore can be found here [[http://www.elvenminstrel.com/music/tuning/horagrams/horagram_intro.htm]]
*From the Wilson Archives on Kraig Grady's [http://Anaphoria.com Anaphoria.com]:
* Wilson Scale tree which is the basis of the horograms can be found here [[http://anaphoria.com/sctree.PDF]]
**[http://anaphoria.com/hrgm.PDF The first set of 32 horograms] &ndash; see also [[Horogram]].
* Charles Lucy describes a technique involving dis-continuous chains of fifths (i.e. skipping some). I write these with X's and O's.
**[http://anaphoria.com/sctree.PDF The Scale Tree] is the basis of the horograms.
* Joe Monzo's helixes could also be of use here...</pre></div>
**[http://anaphoria.com/MOSedo.PDF Moments of Symmetry, of Equal Divisions of the Octave].
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
*From David Finnamore's [http://www.elvenminstrel.com Elevenminstrel.com]: [http://www.elvenminstrel.com/music/tuning/horagrams/horagram_intro.htm 5- To 9-Tone, Octave-Repeating Scales From Wilson's Golden Horagrams of the Scale Tree].
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;MOSDiagrams&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;The moment-of-symmetry process of unfolding a scale takes, for most people, a conceptual leap or two. Best we think about visual ways of bridging the leap.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Lucy]] describes a technique involving dis-continuous chains of fifths (i.e. skipping some).
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Monzo]]'s helixes could also be of use here...
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The first set of 32 horograms can be found here. &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://anaphoria.com/hrgm.PDF" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://anaphoria.com/hrgm.PDF&lt;/a&gt;An excellent introduction by David Finnamore can be found here &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.elvenminstrel.com/music/tuning/horagrams/horagram_intro.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.elvenminstrel.com/music/tuning/horagrams/horagram_intro.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wilson Scale tree which is the basis of the horograms can be found here &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://anaphoria.com/sctree.PDF" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://anaphoria.com/sctree.PDF&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Lucy describes a technique involving dis-continuous chains of fifths (i.e. skipping some). I write these with X's and O's.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joe Monzo's helixes could also be of use here...&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>
*[[User:Xenoindex]]'s charts [[User:Xenoindex/MOS_Charts]]
 
== L and s ==
 
The mechanics of scale generation are such that&mdash;when iterating from one scale to the next densest one&mdash;all large steps in the preceding scale become one large step and one small step in the new scale.  
 
Another way to think about this is that a small-step-sized chunk has been split off of each of the former large steps. The remainder can be either larger or smaller than the small step
 
* If it is larger, then it stays the large step.  
* If it is smaller, then it becomes the new small step, and everything that used to be a small step is now a large step.
 
[[File:MOS iteration rules for L and s.png|452x452px]]
 
We are reasoning about MOS concepts in the abstract here. These truths about large and small steps are true whether they are 100¢ or 4516.8¢, and all we really care about are their ratios. So if we treat our small steps’ size as <span><math>1</math></span> then we can treat our large steps’ size as equal to the <span><math>L{:}s</math></span> ratio.
 
So the <span><math>L{:}s</math></span> ratio decreases by <span><math>1</math></span> because if an <span><math>s</math></span>-sized chunk has been sliced off <span><math>L</math></span>, and <span><math>s</math></span>’s size is <span><math>1</math></span>, then <span><math>1</math></span> should be subtracted from <span><math>L</math></span>.
 
When <span><math>L - s > s</math></span>:
 
<math>
\begin{align}
L’{:}s’ &= (L - s){:}s \\
&= (L - 1){:}1 \\
&= L - 1
\end{align}
</math>
 
When <span><math>L - s < s</math></span>, the result is simply reciprocated:
 
<math>
\begin{align}
L’{:}s’ &= s{:}(L - s) \\
&= 1{:}(L - 1) \\
&= \frac{1}{L - 1}
\end{align}
</math>
 
== See also ==
* [[Gallery of MOS patterns]]
 
[[Category:MOS scale]]
[[Category:Todo:expand]]

Latest revision as of 21:04, 9 November 2024

The moment-of-symmetry process of unfolding a scale takes, for most people, a conceptual leap or two. Below are visualizations of the process:

L and s

The mechanics of scale generation are such that—when iterating from one scale to the next densest one—all large steps in the preceding scale become one large step and one small step in the new scale.

Another way to think about this is that a small-step-sized chunk has been split off of each of the former large steps. The remainder can be either larger or smaller than the small step

  • If it is larger, then it stays the large step.
  • If it is smaller, then it becomes the new small step, and everything that used to be a small step is now a large step.

We are reasoning about MOS concepts in the abstract here. These truths about large and small steps are true whether they are 100¢ or 4516.8¢, and all we really care about are their ratios. So if we treat our small steps’ size as [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math] then we can treat our large steps’ size as equal to the [math]\displaystyle{ L{:}s }[/math] ratio.

So the [math]\displaystyle{ L{:}s }[/math] ratio decreases by [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math] because if an [math]\displaystyle{ s }[/math]-sized chunk has been sliced off [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ s }[/math]’s size is [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math] should be subtracted from [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math].

When [math]\displaystyle{ L - s > s }[/math]:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} L’{:}s’ &= (L - s){:}s \\ &= (L - 1){:}1 \\ &= L - 1 \end{align} }[/math]

When [math]\displaystyle{ L - s < s }[/math], the result is simply reciprocated:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} L’{:}s’ &= s{:}(L - s) \\ &= 1{:}(L - 1) \\ &= \frac{1}{L - 1} \end{align} }[/math]

See also