UD: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
Examples: update row headers per agreement at https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:APS
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''UD''', or '''utonal division''', is a kind of [[Arithmetic tunings|arithmetic]] and [[Monotonic tunings|monotonic]] tuning.
A '''UD''', or '''utonal division''', is a kind of [[Arithmetic tunings|arithmetic]] and [[Harmonotonic tunings|harmonotonic]] tuning.


Its full specification is n-UDp: n utonal divisions of rational interval p. An n-UDO is equivalent to the nth [[Overtone_scale#Next_Steps|undertone mode, or under-n scale]].
== Specification ==


The only difference between n-UDp and [[ELD|n-ELDp (equal length division)]] is that the p for UD is rational, while the p for ELD is irrational.
Its full specification is n-UDp: n utonal divisions of rational interval p.
 
== Formula ==
 
To find the steps for an n-UDp, begin by recognizing that while the ratio between your root pitch's string length and the length you would pluck to get the lowest pitch is <span><math>p</math></span> (or <span><math>\frac p1</math></span>), if you are going to move arithmetically (by repeated addition) from <span><math>1</math></span> to <span><math>p</math></span>, then the difference in string length that you need to cover is not actually <span><math>p</math></span>, but only <span><math>p - 1</math></span>. And because you are dividing it into <span><math>n</math></span> parts, each step will have a size of <span><math>\frac{p-1}{n}</math></span>. So, the formula for the length of step <span><math>k</math></span> of an n-UDp is:
 
<math>
L(k) = 1 + (\frac kn)(p-1)
</math>
 
This way, when <span><math>k</math></span> is <span><math>0</math></span>, <span><math>L(k)</math></span> is simply <span><math>1</math></span>. And when <span><math>k</math></span> is <span><math>n</math></span>, <span><math>L(k)</math></span> is simply <span><math>1 + (p-1) = p</math></span>.
 
== Tip about tunings based on length ==
 
Note that because frequency is the inverse of length, if a frequency lower than the root pitch's frequency is asked for, the length will be greater than 1; at this point the physical analogy to a length of string breaks down somewhat, since it is not easy to imagine dynamically extending the length of a string to accommodate such pitches. However, it is not much of a stretch (pun intended) to tolerate lengths > 1, if the analogy is adapted to a switching from one string to another, and any string length imaginable is instantly available.
 
== Relationship to other tunings ==
 
=== Vs ED ===
 
It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-ELDO.
 
=== Vs under-n series ===
 
An n-UDO is equivalent to the nth [[Overtone_scale#Next_Steps|undertone mode, or under-n scale]].
 
=== Vs ELD ===
 
The only difference between n-UDp and [[ELD|n-ELDp (equal length division)]] is that the p for UD must be rational, while the p for an ELD is probably irrational.
 
=== Vs US ===
 
A UD will be equivalent to some [[US|US (utonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-UD7 = 8-US3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 undertones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4.
 
=== Vs EDL ===


An [[EDL|n-EDL]] is equivalent to a 2n-UDO (therefore EDL cannot be used to represent a UDO with an odd value for n).
An [[EDL|n-EDL]] is equivalent to a 2n-UDO (therefore EDL cannot be used to represent a UDO with an odd value for n).
== Examples ==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+example: 4-UDO = 4th undertone mode
|+example: 4-UDO = 4th undertone mode ''(arranged so that the pitches are in ascending order and still begin on 1/1)''
|-
|-
! quantity
! quantity
Line 17: Line 53:
! 4
! 4
|-
|-
! frequency (f)
! frequency (''f'', ratio)
|(8/8)
|(1/1)
|8/7
|8/7
|8/6
|4/3
|8/5
|8/5
|8/4
|2/1
|-
|-
! pitch (log₂f)
! pitch (log₂''f'', octaves)
|(0)
|(0)
|0.19
|0.19
Line 31: Line 67:
|1.00
|1.00
|-
|-
! length (1/f)
! length (1/''f'', ratio)
|(1/1)
|(8/8)
|7/8
|7/8
|3/4
|6/8
|5/8
|5/8
|4/8
|}
{| class="wikitable"
|+example: 4-UDO = 4th undertone mode ''(descending pitches)''
|-
! quantity
! (0)
! 1
! 2
! 3
! 4
|-
! frequency (''f'', ratio)
|(1/1)
|4/5
|2/3
|4/7
|1/2
|1/2
|-
! pitch (log₂''f'', octaves)
|(0)
| -0.32
| -0.58
| -0.81
| -1.00
|-
! length (1/''f'', ratio)
|(4/4)
|5/4
|6/4
|7/4
|8/4
|}
|}


[[Category:Undertone]]
[[Category:Undertone series]]
[[Category:Utonality]]
[[Category:Utonality]]
[[Category:Subharmonic]]
[[Category:Subharmonic]]
[[Category:Subharmonic series‏‎]]
[[Category:Subharmonic series‏‎]]

Latest revision as of 20:36, 19 October 2023

A UD, or utonal division, is a kind of arithmetic and harmonotonic tuning.

Specification

Its full specification is n-UDp: n utonal divisions of rational interval p.

Formula

To find the steps for an n-UDp, begin by recognizing that while the ratio between your root pitch's string length and the length you would pluck to get the lowest pitch is [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] (or [math]\displaystyle{ \frac p1 }[/math]), if you are going to move arithmetically (by repeated addition) from [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math], then the difference in string length that you need to cover is not actually [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math], but only [math]\displaystyle{ p - 1 }[/math]. And because you are dividing it into [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] parts, each step will have a size of [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{p-1}{n} }[/math]. So, the formula for the length of step [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] of an n-UDp is:

[math]\displaystyle{ L(k) = 1 + (\frac kn)(p-1) }[/math]

This way, when [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ 0 }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ L(k) }[/math] is simply [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math]. And when [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ L(k) }[/math] is simply [math]\displaystyle{ 1 + (p-1) = p }[/math].

Tip about tunings based on length

Note that because frequency is the inverse of length, if a frequency lower than the root pitch's frequency is asked for, the length will be greater than 1; at this point the physical analogy to a length of string breaks down somewhat, since it is not easy to imagine dynamically extending the length of a string to accommodate such pitches. However, it is not much of a stretch (pun intended) to tolerate lengths > 1, if the analogy is adapted to a switching from one string to another, and any string length imaginable is instantly available.

Relationship to other tunings

Vs ED

It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-ELDO.

Vs under-n series

An n-UDO is equivalent to the nth undertone mode, or under-n scale.

Vs ELD

The only difference between n-UDp and n-ELDp (equal length division) is that the p for UD must be rational, while the p for an ELD is probably irrational.

Vs US

A UD will be equivalent to some US (utonal sequence). E.g. 8-UD7 = 8-US3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 undertones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4.

Vs EDL

An n-EDL is equivalent to a 2n-UDO (therefore EDL cannot be used to represent a UDO with an odd value for n).

Examples

example: 4-UDO = 4th undertone mode (arranged so that the pitches are in ascending order and still begin on 1/1)
quantity (0) 1 2 3 4
frequency (f, ratio) (1/1) 8/7 4/3 8/5 2/1
pitch (log₂f, octaves) (0) 0.19 0.42 0.68 1.00
length (1/f, ratio) (8/8) 7/8 6/8 5/8 4/8
example: 4-UDO = 4th undertone mode (descending pitches)
quantity (0) 1 2 3 4
frequency (f, ratio) (1/1) 4/5 2/3 4/7 1/2
pitch (log₂f, octaves) (0) -0.32 -0.58 -0.81 -1.00
length (1/f, ratio) (4/4) 5/4 6/4 7/4 8/4