Talk:The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

26 April 2025

24 April 2025

19 April 2025

17 April 2025

16 April 2025

14 April 2025

13 April 2025

10 April 2025

9 April 2025

8 April 2025

  • curprev 15:1115:11, 8 April 2025 Godtone talk contribs m 7,008 bytes +1,571 clarify purpose of the post as the title and address the only other genuine issue that im aware of that i forgot to address (but which for reasons explained i dont think is actually much of an issue)
  • curprev 14:4014:40, 8 April 2025 Godtone talk contribs 5,437 bytes +3,701 defence of gene's derivation as the best one imo so that it deserves inclusion on the main page, and perhaps some mathematical motivations/details that might not be obvious to the reader could be added to make it more accessible

5 April 2025

  • curprev 18:0218:02, 5 April 2025 Sintel talk contribs 1,736 bytes +35 No edit summary
  • curprev 18:0118:01, 5 April 2025 Sintel talk contribs 1,701 bytes +1,701 Created page with "== Review needed == This page is linked from almost every important edo, and I would consider it "high priority". Despite the length of the page and numerous derivations, some questions and problems remain: * The construction itself remains largely unmotivated. Why the specific error functions? There is a large amount of handwaving and heuristics. We can use different cyclic error functions which will not lead to zeta, but they seem equally valid. If there is no specif..."
Return to "The Riemann zeta function and tuning" page.