Talk:218edo

Suggested Table Replacement

I suggest to replace the table by an expanded version, that contains the intervals mentioned in the synopsis and the error values (absolute in cents, relative in percent of the step size) as well. Here is a preview.

Interval	Steps	Delta		218 × log2 Interval
		rel (%)	abs (¢)
3/2	128	48	2.632	127.52182515721204755691508978062
4/3	90			90.478174842787952443084910219376
5/4	70	18	0.993	70.180324685444991835729635628687
8/5	148			147.81967531455500816427036437131
5/3	161	34	1.880	160.65849952823294427881454584806
6/5	57			57.341500471767055721185454151937
7/4	176	0	0.019	176.00337300855769542234931115654
8/7	42			41.996626991442304577650688843461
10/9	33	14	0.752	33.136674371020896721899456067439
9/5	185			184.86332562897910327810054393256
9/8	37	4	0.240	37.043650314424095113830179561248
16/9	181			180.95634968557590488616982043875
9/7	79	4	0.222	79.040277305866399691480868404709
14/9	139			138.95972269413360030851913159529
11/8	100	16	0.859	100.15609286293080185146114418622
16/11	118			117.84390713706919814853885581378
11/10	30	2	0.133	29.975768177485810015731508557536
20/11	188			188.02423182251418998426849144246
17/16	19	7	0.368	19.066899392573990999386390356668
32/17	199			198.93310060742600900061360964333

Hopefully, the sort function dosn't get confused by combined cells.

What do you think about tables like this? --Xenwolf (talk) 09:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)