User:Dummy index/Heuristics for picking a nonstandard basis of JI subgroup

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Revision as of 15:19, 27 December 2024 by Dummy index (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Just intonation subgroup #Normalization Full-rank == Why not normalize a subgroup? == * Nonoctave gang: ** One says it should be a strict no-twos subgroup for trit...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Just intonation subgroup #Normalization

Full-rank

Why not normalize a subgroup?

  • Nonoctave gang:
    • One says it should be a strict no-twos subgroup for tritave temperament. Another says it might be useful to include 4 for avoiding interval become near-octave (get help from odd-numbered-ed4s).
      • Combined with the convention of putting equave at the first base, it is 3.4.….
  • There is also a style in which the bases are arranged in ascending order without distinction between prime and composite numbers.
  • The desire to choose the basis so that the error is as small as possible.
    • e.g. 2.3.5 12&19 [1 0 -4], 0 1 4]] is intended to 1/4-comma meantone, whereas 2.3.5/3 12&19 [1 0 -4], 0 1 3]] is intended to 1/3-comma meantone.

Guide to manipulating a subgroup