User:Tremend/WIP

Hey guys! I’m sorry if this turns out pretty bad but I’m pretty tired and its 10:53 right here, but whatever. I owe you guys an apology. I'll agree its my fault for not explaining some of these terms, I can see why you think I'm a troll, but would a troll really do all this? I tried explaining some of these terms earlier but it seems like I wasn't clear enough. I'm sorry and I apologize, I know my english isnt perfect but I try my best. Before I start, I gotta say, I coined these terms, I named them and I defined them, if I think theyre useful I'll coin them, no matter how silly the name (you can give me feedback or suggestions if you want), and I already was (and am) planning to write a page for each. I'm hoping this will be clear anough

First, responding to Barium Unque on "wibblepoints" and "adaptive harmony":

First of all, hello, Barium Yes, Wibblepoints could parallel how slight pitch adjustments are used in common-practice music, like the third in chords or leading tones in traditional harmony. However, Wibblepoints differ by how I defined it in previous text: they’re intentional, nuanced microtonal reference points that emerge within the context of non-standard scales. Unlike “adaptive harmony” in common practice, where tonal adjustments are largely intuitive, Wibblepoints are EXPLICTLY structured intervals within alternative tunings, they're not merely interpretative, they’re designed into the lattice. I named wibblepoints like that, because as silly as it may sound, "wibble" sounds like a silly word for "slight bounce" or "wiggle".