Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 498: | Line 498: | ||
::: Re: inconsistent edos, that is indeed one reason why I made the odds table. My humble proposal: if there's no inconsistency in the odds table, use the prime table (showing primes up to 31). Otherwise use the odds table. | ::: Re: inconsistent edos, that is indeed one reason why I made the odds table. My humble proposal: if there's no inconsistency in the odds table, use the prime table (showing primes up to 31). Otherwise use the odds table. | ||
::: Imo even when there's no inconsistency, I can still see the odds table being useful for showing at a glance how e.g. 31edo's 11/9 is really good. And, lack of inconsistency is in itself a piece of information about an edo. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 09:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | ::: Imo even when there's no inconsistency, I can still see the odds table being useful for showing at a glance how e.g. 31edo's 11/9 is really good. And, lack of inconsistency is in itself a piece of information about an edo. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 09:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: I could see including 9 when prime 3 is > 25% off. 9 is a pretty small number, and the 9th harmonic is pretty audible on acoustic instruments. But why include all the other non-prime odd numbers? --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 22:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC) | |||