Talk:JI glyphs: Difference between revisions

Line 6:

: I see, but: What exactly is the harm of that "incompleteness" (remember: this is a wiki)? Nobody really complained about having these icons before and there was time invested into them. To be honest, I'd rather like to have some obvious unique features on pages that distinguish them at a glance so I liked to have icons and colors here and there; in the given case these pages were the (in the eyes of newcomers) most basic just intervals. Why was this change made without talking about it ''first''? Why was this talk not reflected ''before''? I find this a bad style (especially when marked as ''minor change'' as done in all but one case by an [https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/IlL by an apparently hyperactive user]). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

:: Yup that's a problem of communication. There's the Discord community who talked about stuff internally, and Inthar is being the representative making the edits here. Surely it's better to have those people all come and participate, so that all the changes are public. The Discord community is disjoint from the FB groups, which is also bad. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:38, 12 April 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Remove these from interval infoboxes: re ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:17, 12 April 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,317 edits →Remove these from interval infoboxes: re Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: I see, but: What exactly is the harm of that "incompleteness" (remember: this is a wiki)? Nobody really complained about having these icons before and there was time invested into them. To be honest, I'd rather like to have some obvious unique features on pages that distinguish them at a glance so I liked to have icons and colors here and there; in the given case these pages were the (in the eyes of newcomers) most basic just intervals. Why was this change made without talking about it ''first''? Why was this talk not reflected ''before''? I find this a bad style (especially when marked as ''minor change'' as done in all but one case by an [https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/IlL by an apparently hyperactive user]). --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)		: I see, but: What exactly is the harm of that "incompleteness" (remember: this is a wiki)? Nobody really complained about having these icons before and there was time invested into them. To be honest, I'd rather like to have some obvious unique features on pages that distinguish them at a glance so I liked to have icons and colors here and there; in the given case these pages were the (in the eyes of newcomers) most basic just intervals. Why was this change made without talking about it ''first''? Why was this talk not reflected ''before''? I find this a bad style (especially when marked as ''minor change'' as done in all but one case by an [https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/IlL by an apparently hyperactive user]). --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

			:: Yup that's a problem of communication. There's the Discord community who talked about stuff internally, and Inthar is being the representative making the edits here. Surely it's better to have those people all come and participate, so that all the changes are public. The Discord community is disjoint from the FB groups, which is also bad. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)