AFS: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''AFS''', or '''arithmetic frequency sequence''', is a kind of [[Arithmetic tunings|arithmetic]] and [[Monotonic tunings|monotonic]] tuning. | An '''AFS''', or '''arithmetic frequency sequence''', is a kind of [[Arithmetic tunings|arithmetic]] and [[Monotonic tunings|monotonic]] tuning. | ||
An OS is a specific (rational) type of AFS. | |||
(n-)AFSp: (n pitches of an) arithmetic frequency sequence adding by p | |||
shifted overtone series (± frequency) (equivalent to AFS) | |||
AFS(1/7π,7) is saying start at 1/7π and then just move by 1's, so the next step is 1+1/7π which equals (7π+1)/7π, and the next step would be 2+1/7π = (14π+1)/7π, and you'd keep going until you had 7 pitches, so the last one would be (42π+1)/7π. Though that's just the first step, because as I mentioned in my previous comment here, you want the first pitch to be 1/1, so you multiply everything by 7π, so in the end the scale is 1, 7π+1, 14π+1, 21π+1 ... 42π+1. A good way to read AFS(1/p,n) is "start on 1, then add p each step, and go until you have n pitches." | |||
If the new step size is irrational, the tuning is no longer JI, so we use a different acronym to distinguish it: AFS, for arithmetic frequency sequence. For example, if we wanted to move by steps of φ, like this: <span><math>1, 1+φ, 1+2φ, 1+3φ...</math></span> etc. we could have the AFSφ. | |||
OS and AFS are equivalent to taking an overtone series and adding (or subtracting) a constant amount of frequency. By doing this, the step sizes remain equal in frequency, but their relationship in pitch changes. For a detailed explanation of this, see the later section on the [[Monotonic tunings#Derivation of OS|derivation of OS]]. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||