1953 scale: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>MasonGreen1 **Imported revision 567550925 - Original comment: ** |
Wikispaces>MasonGreen1 **Imported revision 567551435 - Original comment: ** |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | ||
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | ||
: This revision was by author [[User:MasonGreen1|MasonGreen1]] and made on <tt>2015-11-23 19: | : This revision was by author [[User:MasonGreen1|MasonGreen1]] and made on <tt>2015-11-23 19:25:14 UTC</tt>.<br> | ||
: The original revision id was <tt> | : The original revision id was <tt>567551435</tt>.<br> | ||
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | ||
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The **1953 scale** is my (Mason Green's) name for a nineteen-note subset of [[53edo]] (a MOS). It is a 15L+4S scale (it has 15 long intervals 3 [[Holdrian comma|Holdrian commas]] wide, plus 4 short intervals 2 Holdrians wide). | <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The **1953 scale** is my (Mason Green's) name for a nineteen-note subset of [[53edo]] (a MOS). It is a 15L+4S scale (it has 15 long intervals 3 [[Holdrian comma|Holdrian commas]] wide, plus 4 short intervals 2 Holdrians wide). | ||
This scale offers a possible alternative to [[19edo]] as a way of expanding beyond 12edo. Unlike 19edo, whose fifths are all significantly flat, the 1953 scale has nearly perfect fifths, making it sound potentially more like 12edo. However, only thirteen of the nineteen fifths are near-perfect; the other 6 fifths are flat at 679 cents, which is close to the Pythagorean wolf fifth. | This scale offers a possible alternative to [[19edo]] as a way of expanding beyond 12edo. Unlike 19edo, whose fifths are all significantly flat, the 1953 scale has nearly perfect fifths, making it sound potentially more like 12edo. Its major thirds are also significantly better than those of 19edo. | ||
However, only thirteen of the nineteen fifths are near-perfect; the other 6 fifths are flat at 679 cents, which is close to the Pythagorean wolf fifth. | |||
Although the abundance of wolf fifths might seem like a disadvantage, composers may use them strategically to add expression to a piece (as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_note|blue note]]s). Another option is to use them as melodic intervals (in melodic lines or modulation) rather than played together harmonically, which lessens the unpleasant effect of the "wolfiness" and can also be used to add expression. | Although the abundance of wolf fifths might seem like a disadvantage, composers may use them strategically to add expression to a piece (as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_note|blue note]]s). Another option is to use them as melodic intervals (in melodic lines or modulation) rather than played together harmonically, which lessens the unpleasant effect of the "wolfiness" and can also be used to add expression. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 54: | ||
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>1953 scale</title></head><body>The <strong>1953 scale</strong> is my (Mason Green's) name for a nineteen-note subset of <a class="wiki_link" href="/53edo">53edo</a> (a MOS). It is a 15L+4S scale (it has 15 long intervals 3 <a class="wiki_link" href="/Holdrian%20comma">Holdrian commas</a> wide, plus 4 short intervals 2 Holdrians wide).<br /> | <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>1953 scale</title></head><body>The <strong>1953 scale</strong> is my (Mason Green's) name for a nineteen-note subset of <a class="wiki_link" href="/53edo">53edo</a> (a MOS). It is a 15L+4S scale (it has 15 long intervals 3 <a class="wiki_link" href="/Holdrian%20comma">Holdrian commas</a> wide, plus 4 short intervals 2 Holdrians wide).<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
This scale offers a possible alternative to <a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo">19edo</a> as a way of expanding beyond 12edo. Unlike 19edo, whose fifths are all significantly flat, the 1953 scale has nearly perfect fifths, making it sound potentially more like 12edo. However, only thirteen of the nineteen fifths are near-perfect; the other 6 fifths are flat at 679 cents, which is close to the Pythagorean wolf fifth.<br /> | This scale offers a possible alternative to <a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo">19edo</a> as a way of expanding beyond 12edo. Unlike 19edo, whose fifths are all significantly flat, the 1953 scale has nearly perfect fifths, making it sound potentially more like 12edo. Its major thirds are also significantly better than those of 19edo.<br /> | ||
<br /> | |||
However, only thirteen of the nineteen fifths are near-perfect; the other 6 fifths are flat at 679 cents, which is close to the Pythagorean wolf fifth.<br /> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Although the abundance of wolf fifths might seem like a disadvantage, composers may use them strategically to add expression to a piece (as <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_note" rel="nofollow">blue note</a>s). Another option is to use them as melodic intervals (in melodic lines or modulation) rather than played together harmonically, which lessens the unpleasant effect of the &quot;wolfiness&quot; and can also be used to add expression.<br /> | Although the abundance of wolf fifths might seem like a disadvantage, composers may use them strategically to add expression to a piece (as <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_note" rel="nofollow">blue note</a>s). Another option is to use them as melodic intervals (in melodic lines or modulation) rather than played together harmonically, which lessens the unpleasant effect of the &quot;wolfiness&quot; and can also be used to add expression.<br /> | ||