User talk:Flirora/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hello. I just saw your EDO impressions page, and when I saw that you said there's not much point in going much bigger than 31edo, I must confess that my first thought was "Really now? You must not have heard of my more recent song '[[:File:Space_Tour.mp3|Space Tour]]'..." and I'm sure such a thing is quite rude, so I'm sorry about that. Still, I do have to say that as others have listened to the song- written in a near-perfect approximation of [[159edo]]- and they seem to really like it. I hope you like it too. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC) | Hello. I just saw your EDO impressions page, and when I saw that you said there's not much point in going much bigger than 31edo, I must confess that my first thought was "Really now? You must not have heard of my more recent song '[[:File:Space_Tour.mp3|Space Tour]]'..." and I'm sure such a thing is quite rude, so I'm sorry about that. Still, I do have to say that as others have listened to the song- written in a near-perfect approximation of [[159edo]]- and they seem to really like it. I hope you like it too. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Yep, I've listened to it a few days ago and loved it. Perhaps "not much of a point in going bigger" is the wrong wording; sorry if it got to you in the wrong way. I think it's a combination of "larger EDOs having less distinct character/fewer limitations" and "larger EDOs being less practical to work with". --[[User:Flirora|Flirora]] ([[User talk:Flirora|talk]]) 15:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:48, 10 December 2020
Diatonicity notation
This m,n-diatonic notation looks quite expressive to me. Is this just an ad hoc invention of yours or a more common convention? --Xenwolf (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Space Tour
Hello. I just saw your EDO impressions page, and when I saw that you said there's not much point in going much bigger than 31edo, I must confess that my first thought was "Really now? You must not have heard of my more recent song 'Space Tour'..." and I'm sure such a thing is quite rude, so I'm sorry about that. Still, I do have to say that as others have listened to the song- written in a near-perfect approximation of 159edo- and they seem to really like it. I hope you like it too. --Aura (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, I've listened to it a few days ago and loved it. Perhaps "not much of a point in going bigger" is the wrong wording; sorry if it got to you in the wrong way. I think it's a combination of "larger EDOs having less distinct character/fewer limitations" and "larger EDOs being less practical to work with". --Flirora (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)