Talk:Chain-of-fifths notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→What about 53edo?: answer |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Do you supposed that this circle of fifths notation makes sense for 53edo at all, or is it really completely impractical? I mean, I have an idea as to how I would do it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | Do you supposed that this circle of fifths notation makes sense for 53edo at all, or is it really completely impractical? I mean, I have an idea as to how I would do it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: It's a subset of ups and downs notation. It's possible to notate any "single-ring" EDOs, in which every note can be accessed by a stack of fifths. | |||
: Btw it's never dictated that only double sharp to double flat should be used. Without higher-order sharp/flats, larger edos are very limited. 26edo, for example, requires Gx to Abb to access every note in the key of C major. Now modulate to any key with more than three accidentals and boom. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC) | |||