Template talk:Todo: Difference between revisions
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
:: In this way we always have a visible effect in some form. | :: In this way we always have a visible effect in some form. | ||
:: --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 14:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC) | :: --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 14:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: I thought an invisible todo with a comment may have uses too? (When a category name isn’t explanative enough but the issue is still minor.) As of opt-in, making less noise by default looks reasonable to me too. | |||
::: About a single <code>comment</code> argument: IIRC in that case, the current version seemed to apply no categories, so there will be no need to change anything (if allowing an invisible commenting todo)? | |||
::: And If page sources are always available to automatic tools then I agree there’s no need to make HTML comments, yeah — I suggested them mainly for this reason. | |||
::: I’ll add opt-in <code>inline</code> switch a bit later, and then maybe let’s make just-comment todos always visible and argument-less todos always invisible, but personally I think that may be too tight. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC) |