Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Let’s list what should be present in the template: | Let’s list what should be present in the template: | ||
* step count | * step count (<code>steps</code>) | ||
* period? (for EDT and several others?) | * period? (for EDT and several others?) | ||
* step size | *: [Xenwolf: no need, consider other templates for other EDs] | ||
* step <code>size</code> | |||
* commas tempered out | * commas tempered out | ||
*: [FloraC: too many stuff] | |||
* notable commas not tempered out? (possibly with an example of distinguished JI intervals?) | * notable commas not tempered out? (possibly with an example of distinguished JI intervals?) | ||
*: [FloraC: too many stuff] | |||
* family? | * family? | ||
* JI subgroup represented fairly well? (and a patent val?) | * JI subgroup represented fairly well? (and a patent val?) | ||
* notable modes? | * notable modes? | ||
*: [FloraC: no consensus] | |||
*: [Arseniiv: now I come to think including entire modes would also bloat the table] | |||
* related EDOs? (maybe more specific relations, like “refines 11edo”?) | * related EDOs? (maybe more specific relations, like “refines 11edo”?) | ||
*: [Xenwolf: include predecessor and successor EDOs] | |||
Thoughts? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 14:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | Thoughts? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 14:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: The parameters <code>step count</code> (or <code>steps</code>) and <code>size</code> seem indisputable to me, EDO implies 2/1 as <code>period</code> (I'd consider to make other templates for other EDs). What about prime factorization? Relates would be great for navigational purposes (for instance predecessor and successor). As far as the parameters can be filled without headaches and without edit wars they should be included. Maybe we can get a community process started about that. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | : The parameters <code>step count</code> (or <code>steps</code>) and <code>size</code> seem indisputable to me, EDO implies 2/1 as <code>period</code> (I'd consider to make other templates for other EDs). What about prime factorization? Relates would be great for navigational purposes (for instance predecessor and successor). As far as the parameters can be filled without headaches and without edit wars they should be included. Maybe we can get a community process started about that. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Do you mean prime factorization for <code>steps</code>? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
: I'm afraid <code>Commas tempered out</code> and <code>Commas not tempered out</code> are too many stuff. And there's no consensus what constitutes "notable". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | : I'm afraid <code>Commas tempered out</code> and <code>Commas not tempered out</code> are too many stuff. And there's no consensus what constitutes "notable". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: (To all:) Is there a consensus about patent vals for EDOs? I seem to remember in several cases there were at least two vals which would be as good, so I don’t know if it’s a good for the template. Also the same about well-representedness of JI subgroups. | |||
:: I added your comments to the list above so they won’t be forgotten if someone would take just the list and make something! --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Relations of various interval categories == | == Relations of various interval categories == | ||