Template talk:Infobox interval: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Auto-applying a category?: new section |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Should this template also insert e. g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Interval]]</nowiki></code> into page text, is it a good idea? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | Should this template also insert e. g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Interval]]</nowiki></code> into page text, is it a good idea? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Yes, in principle, but I'm not clear what the best category (or categories) should be. We have so far mostly: Interval, Interval ratio, Ratio, I also think that the prime limit could (better: should) be added to the parameters: it's applicable in every case and never goes beyond the limits (as monzos do sometimes see 71-limit). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:15, 7 November 2020
Parameter name normalization
it's better to have unique parameter names, so the alternative forms given earlier are now revoked. Pages that make use of them are automatically collected in Category:Todo:normalize interval parameters and should be adjusted from time to time. --Xenwolf (talk) 12:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Auto-applying a category?
Should this template also insert e. g. [[Category:Interval]] into page text, is it a good idea? --Arseniiv (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, in principle, but I'm not clear what the best category (or categories) should be. We have so far mostly: Interval, Interval ratio, Ratio, I also think that the prime limit could (better: should) be added to the parameters: it's applicable in every case and never goes beyond the limits (as monzos do sometimes see 71-limit). --Xenwolf (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)