Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→My Second Idea for a Notation System: draft of glyphs |
||
Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
:: If I take the logic of what I said in the previous comment, that means that a stack of two 33/32 quartertones, plus 8192/8019 plus 729/704 is a full 9/8 whole tone- that means that four quartertones equals a whole tone... If, on the other hand, the rastma is taken from 729/704 and added to 8192/8019, the result is a third 33/32 quartertone plus [[4096/3993]]- another paradiatonic quartertone. This would actually make the addition much more straightforward, as a stack of three 33/32 quartertones plus 4096/3993 is also 9/8. So yes, four quartertones *do* in fact add up to a whole tone. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC) | :: If I take the logic of what I said in the previous comment, that means that a stack of two 33/32 quartertones, plus 8192/8019 plus 729/704 is a full 9/8 whole tone- that means that four quartertones equals a whole tone... If, on the other hand, the rastma is taken from 729/704 and added to 8192/8019, the result is a third 33/32 quartertone plus [[4096/3993]]- another paradiatonic quartertone. This would actually make the addition much more straightforward, as a stack of three 33/32 quartertones plus 4096/3993 is also 9/8. So yes, four quartertones *do* in fact add up to a whole tone. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Here is my draft of quartertone accidentals (in staff context): | |||
::: [[File:Quarter-accidentals-narrow-rastmic-wide.png|300px]] | |||
:::# top line: narrow | |||
:::# middle line: rastmic | |||
:::# bottom line: wide | |||
::: Hope this helps. ---[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC) |