Superparticular ratio: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>Andrew_Heathwaite
**Imported revision 255040632 - Original comment: **
Wikispaces>Sarzadoce
**Imported revision 362668662 - Original comment: **
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:Andrew_Heathwaite|Andrew_Heathwaite]] and made on <tt>2011-09-17 10:28:51 UTC</tt>.<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:Sarzadoce|Sarzadoce]] and made on <tt>2012-09-06 19:06:50 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>255040632</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>362668662</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
Line 11: Line 11:
* The difference tone of the dyad is also the virtual fundamental.
* The difference tone of the dyad is also the virtual fundamental.
* The first 6 such ratios ([[3_2|3/2]], [[4_3|4/3]], [[5_4|5/4]], [[6_5|6/5]], [[7_6|7/6]], [[8_7|8/7]]) are notable [[harmonic entropy]] minima.
* The first 6 such ratios ([[3_2|3/2]], [[4_3|4/3]], [[5_4|5/4]], [[6_5|6/5]], [[7_6|7/6]], [[8_7|8/7]]) are notable [[harmonic entropy]] minima.
* The difference (ie quotient) between two successive epimoric ratios is always an epimoric ratio.
* The difference (i.e. quotient) between two successive epimoric ratios is always an epimoric ratio.
* The sum of two successive epimoric ratios is either an epimoric ratio or an [[Superpartient|epimeric ratio]].
* The sum (i.e. product) of two successive epimoric ratios is either an epimoric ratio or an [[Superpartient|epimeric ratio]].
* Every epimoric ratio can be split into the product of two epimoric ratios. One way is via the identity 1+1/n = (1+1/(2n))*(1+1/(2n+1)), but more than one such splitting may exist.
* Every epimoric ratio can be split into the product of two epimoric ratios. One way is via the identity 1+1/n = (1+1/(2n))*(1+1/(2n+1)), but more than one such splitting method may exist.
* If a/b and c/d are Farey neighbors, that is if a/b &lt; c/d and bc - ad = 1, then (c/d)/(a/b) = bc/ad is epimoric.
* If a/b and c/d are Farey neighbors, that is if a/b &lt; c/d and bc - ad = 1, then (c/d)/(a/b) = bc/ad is epimoric.


Curiously enough, the ancient Greeks did not consider 2/1 to be superparticular because it is a [[Harmonic|multiple of the fundamental]] (the same rule applies to all natural harmonics).
Curiously enough, the ancient Greeks did not consider 2/1 to be superparticular because it is a [[Harmonic|multiple of the fundamental]] (the same rule applies to all natural harmonics in the Greek system).


See: [[List of Superparticular Intervals]] and the Wikipedia page for [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superparticular_number|Superparticular number]].</pre></div>
See: [[List of Superparticular Intervals]] and the Wikipedia page for [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superparticular_number|Superparticular number]].</pre></div>
Line 23: Line 23:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These ratios have some peculiar properties:&lt;br /&gt;
These ratios have some peculiar properties:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The difference tone of the dyad is also the virtual fundamental.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The first 6 such ratios (&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/3_2"&gt;3/2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/4_3"&gt;4/3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/5_4"&gt;5/4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/6_5"&gt;6/5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/7_6"&gt;7/6&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/8_7"&gt;8/7&lt;/a&gt;) are notable &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/harmonic%20entropy"&gt;harmonic entropy&lt;/a&gt; minima.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The difference (ie quotient) between two successive epimoric ratios is always an epimoric ratio.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The sum of two successive epimoric ratios is either an epimoric ratio or an &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Superpartient"&gt;epimeric ratio&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Every epimoric ratio can be split into the product of two epimoric ratios. One way is via the identity 1+1/n = (1+1/(2n))*(1+1/(2n+1)), but more than one such splitting may exist.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;If a/b and c/d are Farey neighbors, that is if a/b &amp;lt; c/d and bc - ad = 1, then (c/d)/(a/b) = bc/ad is epimoric.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The difference tone of the dyad is also the virtual fundamental.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The first 6 such ratios (&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/3_2"&gt;3/2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/4_3"&gt;4/3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/5_4"&gt;5/4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/6_5"&gt;6/5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/7_6"&gt;7/6&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/8_7"&gt;8/7&lt;/a&gt;) are notable &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/harmonic%20entropy"&gt;harmonic entropy&lt;/a&gt; minima.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The difference (i.e. quotient) between two successive epimoric ratios is always an epimoric ratio.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The sum (i.e. product) of two successive epimoric ratios is either an epimoric ratio or an &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Superpartient"&gt;epimeric ratio&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Every epimoric ratio can be split into the product of two epimoric ratios. One way is via the identity 1+1/n = (1+1/(2n))*(1+1/(2n+1)), but more than one such splitting method may exist.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;If a/b and c/d are Farey neighbors, that is if a/b &amp;lt; c/d and bc - ad = 1, then (c/d)/(a/b) = bc/ad is epimoric.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Curiously enough, the ancient Greeks did not consider 2/1 to be superparticular because it is a &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Harmonic"&gt;multiple of the fundamental&lt;/a&gt; (the same rule applies to all natural harmonics).&lt;br /&gt;
Curiously enough, the ancient Greeks did not consider 2/1 to be superparticular because it is a &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Harmonic"&gt;multiple of the fundamental&lt;/a&gt; (the same rule applies to all natural harmonics in the Greek system).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/List%20of%20Superparticular%20Intervals"&gt;List of Superparticular Intervals&lt;/a&gt; and the Wikipedia page for &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superparticular_number" rel="nofollow"&gt;Superparticular number&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>
See: &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/List%20of%20Superparticular%20Intervals"&gt;List of Superparticular Intervals&lt;/a&gt; and the Wikipedia page for &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superparticular_number" rel="nofollow"&gt;Superparticular number&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>