Talk:39edo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
: Overall, I think 39 and 39d should have about equal coverage, with structures in both presented. The page definitely should explain how 39d improves accuracy of many intervals, and it should be up to the reader to decide which perspective they agree with, and which mapping to use. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 30 May 2026 (UTC) | : Overall, I think 39 and 39d should have about equal coverage, with structures in both presented. The page definitely should explain how 39d improves accuracy of many intervals, and it should be up to the reader to decide which perspective they agree with, and which mapping to use. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 30 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: I agree with Overthink on this front. At the very least, the patent val should be given in the interval table, and it should probably be discussed in other parts of the page, but I recognize 39d as a legitimate interpretation as well. Most people looking for an edo to use don't really care about TE either. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 10:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: That sounds very sensible — put my vote in for that as well. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:36, 30 May 2026 (UTC) | :: That sounds very sensible — put my vote in for that as well. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:36, 30 May 2026 (UTC) | ||