Template talk:Navbox Lumatone: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
A recent edit broke this template: update: problem fixed by arrowhead
Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings?
Line 3: Line 3:


: Update: This appears to be fixed now. Thank you :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 00:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
: Update: This appears to be fixed now. Thank you :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 00:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
== Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings? ==
If I try to use Navbox Lumatone for a mapping for a non-octave tuning, it thinks it is a mapping for an EDO and inserts it into the Lumatone mapping for ###edo series for navigation purposes.  Any easy fix for this?  So far have 3 pages currently affected (really should be 4, but Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce currently counts as a named tuning temperament page and not Lumatone mapping for 13edt, whereas it is actually both).  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:10, 23 October 2025

A recent edit broke this template

A recent edit broke this template, now it says “Lua error in Module:Navbar at line 33: attempt to index global 'root_page_name' (a nil value).” Please fix it asap. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Update: This appears to be fixed now. Thank you :) --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings?

If I try to use Navbox Lumatone for a mapping for a non-octave tuning, it thinks it is a mapping for an EDO and inserts it into the Lumatone mapping for ###edo series for navigation purposes. Any easy fix for this? So far have 3 pages currently affected (really should be 4, but Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce currently counts as a named tuning temperament page and not Lumatone mapping for 13edt, whereas it is actually both). Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)