Path-based goodness: Difference between revisions
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
6. 38et: goodness 23.3. 2: 2.26. score <3, <6: 4.8%, 13.6% which is likely easy to navigate due to sharing features with 19edo | 6. 38et: goodness 23.3. 2: 2.26. score <3, <6: 4.8%, 13.6% which is likely easy to navigate due to sharing features with 19edo | ||
7. 24et: goodness 22.8. 2: 0.03. score <3, <6: 4.9%, 15.3% | 7. 24et: goodness 22.8. 2: 0.03. score <3, <6: 4.9%, 15.3% | ||
8. 29et: goodness 22.8. 2: 2.45. score <3, <6: 4.6%, 14.0% Note that | 8. 29et: goodness 22.8. 2: 2.45. score <3, <6: 4.6%, 14.0% Note that 29et is identical to 58et on the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup | ||
9. 40et: goodness 22.7. 2: 1.51. score <3, <6: 4.4%, 12.4% which is likely easy to navigate due to supporting orwell and diminished | 9. 40et: goodness 22.7. 2: 1.51. score <3, <6: 4.4%, 12.4% which is likely easy to navigate due to supporting orwell and diminished | ||
10. 22et: goodness 22.5. 2: -0.51. score <3, <6: 4.8%, 15.1% the best temperament below 29 | 10. 22et: goodness 22.5. 2: -0.51. score <3, <6: 4.8%, 15.1% the best temperament below 29 | ||