Path-based goodness: Difference between revisions
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
8. 29et: goodness 22.8. 2: 2.45. score <3, <6: 4.6%, 14.0% Note that in the 13-limit, 29et is identical to 58et on the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup | 8. 29et: goodness 22.8. 2: 2.45. score <3, <6: 4.6%, 14.0% Note that in the 13-limit, 29et is identical to 58et on the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup | ||
9. 40et: goodness 22.7. 2: 1.51. score <3, <6: 4.4%, 12.4% which is likely easy to navigate due to supporting orwell and diminished | 9. 40et: goodness 22.7. 2: 1.51. score <3, <6: 4.4%, 12.4% which is likely easy to navigate due to supporting orwell and diminished | ||
10. 22et: goodness 22.5. 2: -0.51. score <3, <6: 4.8%, 15.1% | 10. 22et: goodness 22.5. 2: -0.51. score <3, <6: 4.8%, 15.1% the best temperament below 29 | ||
11. 26et: goodness 22.4. 2: 2.57. score <3, <6: 4.5%, 15.0% | 11. 26et: goodness 22.4. 2: 2.57. score <3, <6: 4.5%, 15.0% | ||
12. 27et: goodness 22.4. 2: -2.56. score <3, <6: 5.0%, 14.4% | 12. 27et: goodness 22.4. 2: -2.56. score <3, <6: 5.0%, 14.4% | ||
13. 19et: goodness 21.5. 2: 3.75. score <3, <6: 5.5%, 17.7% | 13. 19et: goodness 21.5. 2: 3.75. score <3, <6: 5.5%, 17.7% the best temperament below 22 | ||
14. 32et: goodness 20.2. 2: -0.45. score <3, <6: 4.9%, 14.3% which is likely easy to navigate due to supporting pajara | 14. 32et: goodness 20.2. 2: -0.45. score <3, <6: 4.9%, 14.3% which is likely easy to navigate due to supporting pajara | ||
15. 39et: goodness 20.1. 2: -1.63. score <3, <6: 5.6%, 14.4% | 15. 39et: goodness 20.1. 2: -1.63. score <3, <6: 5.6%, 14.4% | ||