User:Hkm/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Badness == | == Badness == | ||
We say that is the score of a "step" is equal to 1/(min_cents + (the motion's error in cents)**error_power) * complexity_fondness**(the complexity of the motion) / goodness_measurer. We then say that the score of a "path" is equal to the product of the scores of the steps. The score of a temperament is equal to the sum of the scores of all paths that reach the original interval times those path lengths. The goodness of a temperament is the goodness_measurer necessary to get a score of magic_number. (This also works for scales without JI interpretations; we assign a JI interpretation to each pair of notes and compute the goodness of the best assignment.) | Let a "step" be any JI interval. We say that is the score of a "step" is equal to 1/(min_cents + (the motion's error in cents)**error_power) * complexity_fondness**(the complexity of the motion) / goodness_measurer. We then say that the score of a "path" is equal to the product of the scores of the steps. The score of a temperament is equal to the sum of the scores of all paths that reach the original interval times those path lengths. The goodness of a temperament is the goodness_measurer necessary to get a score of magic_number. (This also works for scales without JI interpretations; we assign a JI interpretation to each pair of notes and compute the goodness of the best assignment.) |
Revision as of 19:53, 25 June 2025
![]() |
This user page is editable by any wiki editor.
As a general rule, most users expect their user space to be edited only by themselves, except for minor edits (e.g. maintenance), undoing obviously harmful edits such as vandalism or disruptive editing, and user talk pages. However, by including this message box, the author of this user page has indicated that this page is open to contributions from other users (e.g. content-related edits). |
Sadbox
Practicality
3 Wedgies
5 TE
5 Otonality and utonality (what are the musical implications?)
2 Balanced word
2 43ed2
3 31ed2 (beginner-friendliness)
Writing
5 Intro to Xenharmonics (can be supplemented with user:hkm/Intro_page)
4 Concordance
2 29ed2 (needs a clearer focus on essentially tempered chords in the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup, less focus on temperaments of 29edo, and less trivia)
4 Periodicity block
3 FAQ
Criticality
1 Oodako
1 Trug
1 Oviminor
2 A bunch of stub pages
Naming
1 1025/1024
Design
2 Ploidacot (why the number names?)
Formatting
2 Practically all edo pages <50 (algorithmically generated material, like GPVs and sagittal notations, should be moved to the GPV and sagittal pages, for example. The interval table gets to stay though)
Badness
Let a "step" be any JI interval. We say that is the score of a "step" is equal to 1/(min_cents + (the motion's error in cents)**error_power) * complexity_fondness**(the complexity of the motion) / goodness_measurer. We then say that the score of a "path" is equal to the product of the scores of the steps. The score of a temperament is equal to the sum of the scores of all paths that reach the original interval times those path lengths. The goodness of a temperament is the goodness_measurer necessary to get a score of magic_number. (This also works for scales without JI interpretations; we assign a JI interpretation to each pair of notes and compute the goodness of the best assignment.)